"Washington State's Gun Laws are working"

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

sanjuro893

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
3,440
Reaction score
797
Location
Del City
This article is full of so much fail I had to share it.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/19/washington-state-s-new-gun-laws-are-working.html

"

Cliff Schecter

What Voters Want
08.19.16 12:03 AM ET
Washington State’s New Gun Laws Are Working
Voters are poised to pass for themselves the sort of simple common-sense measure that could avert mass shootings around the country.


SEATTLE — In an upbeat downtown office, Renee Hopkins, the executive director of the Alliance for Gun Responsibility, and her team of about 20 are doing for the people of Washington state what seems impossible in Washington, D.C., and many state capitals—passing real gun safety reforms.

When we think of the insane, bloody gun culture Republicans lawmakers have created, a few words come to mind: obstruction; obfuscation; obstreperousness. It is easy to believe the situation is helpless.

The National Rifle Association—led by a coterie of money-grubbing radicals addicted to arms dealers’ cash and indifferent to the actual views of the gun owners they’re supposed to represent—controls enough senators and congressmen to block even reforms supported by an overwhelming majority of voters.

As they say, necessity is the mother of invention, and so it’s been left to a hub of the tech world to find a way to disrupt those broken politics and revivify a 100-year-old progressive innovation: the ballot initiative.

This November, Washingtonians will get to vote on a ballot measure to place extreme-risk-protection orders into law. If that passes, it would be a second big win, after the people of Washington instituted universal background checks on the purchase of all firearms in 2014.

These new protection orders would be modeled on the state’s domestic violence and sexual-assault-protection orders, giving family members or law enforcement the right to petition a court to remove firearms from someone who is a danger to themselves or others.

It is the sort of simple common sense measure that could avert mass shootings around the country.

When I talk to Stephanie Ervin, the manager of the campaign, she’s optimistic, but cautious, that the group can build from its previous success: “In 2014, we were able to win 60 percent of the vote for universal background checks in a non-presidential year. Even as gun groups were placing a separate measure on the ballot with the sole purpose being to confuse voters.”

Polling—if you’re not into chemtrails and unskewing—seems to back up Ervin’s proposition. The Elway Poll, which released numbers this week on a variety of ballot initiatives set to go before voters in November, found that a solid 64 percent of Washington voters intend to support I-491 (the name of the ballot measure), with only 18 percent opposing it. This includes a majority of Republicans (55 percent) and men (57 percent), and huge margins among Democrats (75 percent) and women (70 percent).

The initiative also has a number of prominent third-party endorsees, including judges, prosecutors, police officers, faith leaders, health experts, the domestic violence prevention community, gun owners, and gun violence survivors. They have over 14,000 donors and have gathered over 330,000 signatures for their petitions. All rather impressive for a measure the NRA claims has no popular support.

Washington also legalized marijuana and gay marriage (before the court decision legalizing it nationally) through ballot initiatives. But with the substantial distortion of our democracy around guns, they are the issue with which this particular method most adheres to the original intentions of the progressives who created it a century ago, at a time when large interests such as timber and railroads blocked popular reforms in legislative bodies around the country.

Additionally, this application of direct democracy is not simply a way to ensure the moneyed death-peddlers behind the NRA can’t veto laws Washingtonians overwhelmingly want, but also provides a model for the 24 states—among them large population centers such as California, Florida, Illinois, and Ohio—that allow citizens to change laws via direct democracy.

Both Nevada and Maine have run with their own measures this year to institute background checks that more than 80 percent of their citizens want, which will in turn influence the conversation and provide more evidence that just as the sun sets in the west and swimmers making up stories about robbery in Rio is a bad idea, gun laws work.

As the Alliance says on their website, “survivors and family members of those killed in mass shootings at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle in 2006, Seattle’s Cafe Racer in 2012, University of California Santa-Barbara in 2014, and others have all testified that they believe this type of law could have been used to prevent these tragedies.” Like clockwork, after almost every one of these tragedies, we discover the maddening truth that someone who knew the shooter knew they were dangerously unstable.

What the Alliance for Gun Responsibility and its allies are doing is nothing short of trailblazing the path that can free America from the hostage takers of bought-off legislatures and gun nuts with grudges.

It’s a path that leads to a country where tragic, meaningless death and injury on a daily basis are no longer daily occurrences but a thing of the dark past."
 

Rod Snell

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
362
Location
Altus
The Air Force chose to send me to the University of Washington in Seattle; I graduated in 1970. It was a novel place to a boy from KY, and there was a large minority of liberals in the half million people living west of the Cascades.

Now the population west of the Cascades is 1 1/2 million, and a large part of the added million came from.........wait for it.....CALIFORNIA!!

Last time I visited, 60% of the population was raving libs, wiling to believe any type of utopian nonsense, thinking laws can prevent crime and bring nirvana.
The article is right about one thing, they can pass any crackpot law they want to without regard to logic or cause and effect.
 

Frederick

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
2,742
Reaction score
2,315
Location
Oklahoma City
He sounds like an ideologue with poor argumentative skills relying on fancy, obscure and archaic words to make himself sound like he knows more than he actually does.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,778
Reaction score
62,422
Location
Ponca City Ok
Which mass shooting would this have prevented? Guns used in all I can think of were legally bought or stolen, but let's not bring facts to the table, lets rely on somebody deeming another is unstable, relieving them of their constitutional rights.
Just how would that process work? Some progressive liberal head shrink have to diagnose you, or does the new law allow a pissed off girlfriend you just broke up with start screaming your unstable, and your committed involuntarily to seeing the anti gun liberal progressive shrink or lose your rights?
Maybe a comment on a gun forum like "nuke em all and let God sort em out" made in jest be justification to come into your house and take your guns because it's obvious nobody with a stable mind could make that statement, therefore you just became an unstable person.
What hogwash.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom