Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Well, lets see em!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="r00s7a" data-source="post: 1665474" data-attributes="member: 9675"><p>As your attorney, I'm going to say that argument might not hold up if you were in court. To quote you, "actually found" is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Let's switch this to people instead of chickens and bobcats. Little Timmy disappeared from his bedroom. As the parent, you make sure all the child killers are kept away. Yet when Little Timmy disappeared, you shot and killed a male adult in the area, because he was "capable" of taking poor little Timmy from his bed. That does not mean he did it, as you did not catch him in the act, and there is reasonable doubt as to his guilt. You'd probably be prosecuted for it because you had no proof. Same goes for the bobcat. He is capable of it, but he was not witnessed killing chickens, there was no proof mentioned that he was the one killing chickens, he was only seen in the area where the chickens disappeared.</p><p></p><p>I'm only ribbing you here, and not judging... just playing devil's advocate. <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /> You are the one that pulled the trigger, so I'm going to assume you made the correct judgement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="r00s7a, post: 1665474, member: 9675"] As your attorney, I'm going to say that argument might not hold up if you were in court. To quote you, "actually found" is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Let's switch this to people instead of chickens and bobcats. Little Timmy disappeared from his bedroom. As the parent, you make sure all the child killers are kept away. Yet when Little Timmy disappeared, you shot and killed a male adult in the area, because he was "capable" of taking poor little Timmy from his bed. That does not mean he did it, as you did not catch him in the act, and there is reasonable doubt as to his guilt. You'd probably be prosecuted for it because you had no proof. Same goes for the bobcat. He is capable of it, but he was not witnessed killing chickens, there was no proof mentioned that he was the one killing chickens, he was only seen in the area where the chickens disappeared. I'm only ribbing you here, and not judging... just playing devil's advocate. :) You are the one that pulled the trigger, so I'm going to assume you made the correct judgement. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Well, lets see em!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom