Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What are the chances that congress passes a limit on magazine capacity
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 2082897" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>How do you think we've been making the progress in the past few months that we have? Mr. Collin Niore, Phillip DeFranco, Amidst The Noise, etc... all of these Youtube channels are opening their comments and social media pages up to open debate without name-calling and they're absolutely destroying the antis in a very respectful manner using only science, facts, and logic. Their message comes across as intelligent and not angry/name-calling. Phillip DeFranco got an interview via Youtube with the Vice President (where he basically used facts to force Biden to admit that Assault Weapons aren't used in crimes).</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying to be nice or trust politicians. I'm saying don't act like the same jackasses we're pointing the fingers at (the "libtards"). You can say "they can move together and have their little utopia in their part of the country" all you want, but if they represent the majority and they vote, they'll keep being as aggressive and illogical as those who are screaming without facts or name-calling on our side.</p><p></p><p>Times are different now. Based on almost no mainstream media information at all, proper information has been passed around to enough people that the Vice President admitted that assault weapons aren't used in that many crimes (and pointed out that a Shotgun is more affective). Clinton, a former President who was very anti-gun, gave a speech warning folks against being overly anti-gun, and Obama is now wavering - which is undermining Feinstein's momentum behind her bill. These things all tell a powerful and damning story to their cause and are a clear sign of a retreat back to the stand on high-cap mags.</p><p></p><p>Staying the course of standing on real information and getting the word out in a respectful/factual way is working. We're taken much more seriously as having a legitimate argument when we act like adults and the other side is name-calling, misdirecting, and hiding information. The stereotypes of the 70s and 80s are all the anti's have to stand on and that ground is crumbling. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not saying the battle is won, but we made nowhere near this type of progress in 94. There are plenty of people left that need convincing and facts, logic, and a cool-head will win the high-cap ban debate as well. We're not trying to convince politicians - just their constituents... That's who they fear.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 2082897, member: 229"] How do you think we've been making the progress in the past few months that we have? Mr. Collin Niore, Phillip DeFranco, Amidst The Noise, etc... all of these Youtube channels are opening their comments and social media pages up to open debate without name-calling and they're absolutely destroying the antis in a very respectful manner using only science, facts, and logic. Their message comes across as intelligent and not angry/name-calling. Phillip DeFranco got an interview via Youtube with the Vice President (where he basically used facts to force Biden to admit that Assault Weapons aren't used in crimes). I'm not saying to be nice or trust politicians. I'm saying don't act like the same jackasses we're pointing the fingers at (the "libtards"). You can say "they can move together and have their little utopia in their part of the country" all you want, but if they represent the majority and they vote, they'll keep being as aggressive and illogical as those who are screaming without facts or name-calling on our side. Times are different now. Based on almost no mainstream media information at all, proper information has been passed around to enough people that the Vice President admitted that assault weapons aren't used in that many crimes (and pointed out that a Shotgun is more affective). Clinton, a former President who was very anti-gun, gave a speech warning folks against being overly anti-gun, and Obama is now wavering - which is undermining Feinstein's momentum behind her bill. These things all tell a powerful and damning story to their cause and are a clear sign of a retreat back to the stand on high-cap mags. Staying the course of standing on real information and getting the word out in a respectful/factual way is working. We're taken much more seriously as having a legitimate argument when we act like adults and the other side is name-calling, misdirecting, and hiding information. The stereotypes of the 70s and 80s are all the anti's have to stand on and that ground is crumbling. I'm not saying the battle is won, but we made nowhere near this type of progress in 94. There are plenty of people left that need convincing and facts, logic, and a cool-head will win the high-cap ban debate as well. We're not trying to convince politicians - just their constituents... That's who they fear. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What are the chances that congress passes a limit on magazine capacity
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom