Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What the Hell?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="angsniper" data-source="post: 1553209" data-attributes="member: 6627"><p>I don't have any problem with an officer wanting the weapon in his control during a stop if it makes them feel safer. As long as I get it back afterwards he's done his business. I'm law abiding and I'm not worried about it as long as the cop isn't trying to seize my weapon because he doesn't think I need one. My issue with the whole story is that the courts decided that the fact he, <strong>THE FELON</strong> was in possession of a weapon and admitted ownership of said weapon, could not be used as reason to assest <strong>THE FELON</strong> for a weapons violation!</p><p></p><p>ETA: in the couple times I was pulled over (got warning) the cop asked what I was carrying and where it was but has never even asked to see it let alone take it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="angsniper, post: 1553209, member: 6627"] I don't have any problem with an officer wanting the weapon in his control during a stop if it makes them feel safer. As long as I get it back afterwards he's done his business. I'm law abiding and I'm not worried about it as long as the cop isn't trying to seize my weapon because he doesn't think I need one. My issue with the whole story is that the courts decided that the fact he, [B]THE FELON[/B] was in possession of a weapon and admitted ownership of said weapon, could not be used as reason to assest [B]THE FELON[/B] for a weapons violation! ETA: in the couple times I was pulled over (got warning) the cop asked what I was carrying and where it was but has never even asked to see it let alone take it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What the Hell?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom