Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Which Oklahoma Sheriffs will NOT help the Federal government in gun confiscation?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flybeech" data-source="post: 2034915" data-attributes="member: 7557"><p>I see. I stand corrected. I appreciate your correcting me.</p><p></p><p>I believed the Sheriff was the highest elected law enforcement officer in the land and had every right and authority to tell an oppressive tyrannical Federal government to pound sand, such Sheriffs Mack and Tony DeMeo have done, but thanks to you, I understand now that the things these mythical creatures did never happened.</p><p></p><p>I'm still having difficulty accepting your version that we live in a top-down hierarchy, with centralized powers that trump everything and the office of Sheriff no longer means anything. I was inspired by the book "The County Sheriff: America's Last Hope" by Richard Mack. His book is completely opposite of your comprehensive and deeply enlightened synopsis of the powers of the county Sheriff. I would enjoy reading your works that contradict Sheriff Mack's interpretation of the office.</p><p></p><p>Again, SMS, I appreciate your version of what is right and good. Top down central control is what you favor and admire. I look forward to reading your books.</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://cspoa.org/" target="_blank">http://cspoa.org/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flybeech, post: 2034915, member: 7557"] I see. I stand corrected. I appreciate your correcting me. I believed the Sheriff was the highest elected law enforcement officer in the land and had every right and authority to tell an oppressive tyrannical Federal government to pound sand, such Sheriffs Mack and Tony DeMeo have done, but thanks to you, I understand now that the things these mythical creatures did never happened. I'm still having difficulty accepting your version that we live in a top-down hierarchy, with centralized powers that trump everything and the office of Sheriff no longer means anything. I was inspired by the book "The County Sheriff: America's Last Hope" by Richard Mack. His book is completely opposite of your comprehensive and deeply enlightened synopsis of the powers of the county Sheriff. I would enjoy reading your works that contradict Sheriff Mack's interpretation of the office. Again, SMS, I appreciate your version of what is right and good. Top down central control is what you favor and admire. I look forward to reading your books. [url]http://cspoa.org/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Which Oklahoma Sheriffs will NOT help the Federal government in gun confiscation?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom