Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Which Oklahoma Sheriffs will NOT help the Federal government in gun confiscation?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flybeech" data-source="post: 2035092" data-attributes="member: 7557"><p>Believe it or not, the Federal government has decided to do illegal or unconstitutional things without a court order and the Sheriff IS the citizen's last hope. The first one that jumps to mind is over certain water rights in Nye County, Nevada. This is the example of Sheriff Tony DeMeo, who successfully defended the Constitutional rights of a Wayne Hage and his family. The Federal government wanted the water rights of the ranch, but could not seize them as long as the family had a use in their cattle operation. The Federal government simply started rustling the cattle and selling them in town, with the intent of eliminating the Hage need for their water rights. That's when Sheriff DeMeo stepped in. Sheriff DeMeo discusses the Hage case on YouTube and there are numerous articles involving this case and many, many others.</p><p></p><p>I never understood or appreciated the importance of the office of Sheriff until I read the Sheriff Mack's book. It was an easy read and a real eye-opener. I would encourage anyone to read that book, visit the <a href="http://cspoa.org/" target="_blank">http://cspoa.org/</a> website and see some of the videos on YouTube.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps we've got off on the wrong foot. I resented what sounded like the remarks of an avowed Statist, saying the constitution doesn't matter, calling an office I've come to admire a mythical relic of a Hobbit world. To me, it does matter if ANY elected official is a "constitutionalist".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flybeech, post: 2035092, member: 7557"] Believe it or not, the Federal government has decided to do illegal or unconstitutional things without a court order and the Sheriff IS the citizen's last hope. The first one that jumps to mind is over certain water rights in Nye County, Nevada. This is the example of Sheriff Tony DeMeo, who successfully defended the Constitutional rights of a Wayne Hage and his family. The Federal government wanted the water rights of the ranch, but could not seize them as long as the family had a use in their cattle operation. The Federal government simply started rustling the cattle and selling them in town, with the intent of eliminating the Hage need for their water rights. That's when Sheriff DeMeo stepped in. Sheriff DeMeo discusses the Hage case on YouTube and there are numerous articles involving this case and many, many others. I never understood or appreciated the importance of the office of Sheriff until I read the Sheriff Mack's book. It was an easy read and a real eye-opener. I would encourage anyone to read that book, visit the [url]http://cspoa.org/[/url] website and see some of the videos on YouTube. Perhaps we've got off on the wrong foot. I resented what sounded like the remarks of an avowed Statist, saying the constitution doesn't matter, calling an office I've come to admire a mythical relic of a Hobbit world. To me, it does matter if ANY elected official is a "constitutionalist". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Which Oklahoma Sheriffs will NOT help the Federal government in gun confiscation?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom