Whistle-Blower Fired From Hanford Nuclear Site After Raising Safety Concerns

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ez bake

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,535
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa Area
Interesting...


http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/whistle-blower-fired-hanford-nuclear-site-22568963



Whistle-blower Donna Busche, who raised safety concerns at the nation's most polluted nuclear weapons production site, was fired Tuesday from her job at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

Busche's complaints are part of a string of whistle-blower and other claims related to the design and safety of an unfinished waste treatment plant at Hanford.

Busche, 50, said she was called into the office Tuesday morning and told she was being fired for cause.

"I turned in my key and turned in my badge and left the building," Busche told The Associated Press in a telephone interview from Richland.

Busche worked for URS Corp., which is helping build a $12 billion plant to turn Hanford's most dangerous wastes into glass. Construction of the plant has been halted over safety concerns. Busche has filed complaints with the federal government, alleging she has suffered retaliation since filing her original safety complaint in 2011.

Hanford was created by the federal government in the 1940s as part of the top-secret project to build the atomic bomb, and cleanup costs today run about $2 billion annually.

Central to the cleanup is dealing with 53 million gallons of highly radioactive waste left from decades of plutonium production for the nation's nuclear weapons arsenal. The waste is stored in 177 aging underground tanks, many of which have leaked, threatening the groundwater and the neighboring Columbia River.

The U.S. Department of Energy is investigating Busche's safety concerns, while the U.S. Department of Labor is reviewing her complaints about retaliation and harassment.

URS Corp. said in a statement it encourages employees to raise safety concerns.

"We do not agree with her assertions that she suffered retaliation or was otherwise treated unfairly," URS said, adding Busche was fired for reasons unrelated to the safety concerns. "Ms. Busche's allegations will not withstand scrutiny."

The Energy Department, which owns Hanford, said it was informed of the firing after the fact. "The department was not asked to and did not approve this action," the agency said in a news release.

A one-of-a-kind plant is being built to convert the waste into glasslike logs for permanent disposal underground, but it has faced numerous technical problems, delays and cost increases.

Busche is the second Hanford whistle-blower to be fired by URS in recent months. Walter Tamosaitis, who also raised safety concerns about the plant, was fired in October after 44 years of employment.

Busche, who worked at the plant for nearly five years, said she had been expecting to be fired for the past month.

"Right now I will take a deep breath, file for unemployment and start another lawsuit for wrongful termination," Busche said.

She declined to reveal her salary but called herself a "highly compensated executive." Busche was a manager of environmental and nuclear safety at the waste treatment plant construction site, and her primary job was ensuring compliance with dangerous waste permits and safety documents.

Tom Carpenter of the watchdog group Hanford Challenge called Busche's firing an act of desperation.

"They couldn't make her leave," Carpenter said. "Hanford's war on whistle-blowers has taken a new victim."

Busche worked at Energy Department nuclear complexes her entire career, generally in nuclear safety, quality assurance or regulatory compliance.

Busche filed her most recent complaint in November, alleging she has suffered retaliation by URS and Bechtel National Inc., the plant's main contractor. She filed the new complaint with the Labor Department.
 

criticalbass

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
5,596
Reaction score
7
Location
OKC
Very interesting indeed. When the government contracts out work, many of the protections that Federal employees have either disappear or are ignored by the contractor. A standard acceptance letter says something to the effect that "you can fire me any time for no reason and I know I have no recourse, and I can quit any time I want to."

That's one of the many reasons there are so many contract employees doing Federal work. Some of the larger contractors are ripe for unionization, but the supply of workers up to now makes it very difficult to organize. However, every employer eventually has the union it deserves. That can range from none to something like the Teamsters (who are better to deal with than some other unions!).

The woman who was fired would not, of course, have been in any bargaining unit, given that she was a "highly compensated executive." I suspect the company did not do this right. Right would be a solid record of a series of performance improvement conferences, signed by both parties, company and employe, with details on performance that needed to improve, and consequences if it did not.

A great many people who probably should have been fired prevail in court or some other venue when management does not build their case properly.

From the sound of this article, I suspect this is a simple act of reprisal, and if that is so, I hope she gets a ton of money.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom