Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Why are Oklahoma's roads so crappy?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2587852" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>A lot of people don't distinguish between laws--i.e. statutes--and administrative rules, either because they don't think the person to whom they're speaking will understand the subtleties, or because they themselves don't. Violation of a rule can still lead to prosecution in court and assessment of penalties, it's just handled in an agency court instead of District Court, and all of the parties (save for the defendant) are agency employees. The end result to the defendant is much the same.</p><p></p><p>I only point this out to explain why I didn't find it in Title 69; it could still be a binding rule, it'd just be a lot more challenging to find.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2587852, member: 13624"] A lot of people don't distinguish between laws--i.e. statutes--and administrative rules, either because they don't think the person to whom they're speaking will understand the subtleties, or because they themselves don't. Violation of a rule can still lead to prosecution in court and assessment of penalties, it's just handled in an agency court instead of District Court, and all of the parties (save for the defendant) are agency employees. The end result to the defendant is much the same. I only point this out to explain why I didn't find it in Title 69; it could still be a binding rule, it'd just be a lot more challenging to find. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Why are Oklahoma's roads so crappy?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom