Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Wild Porker
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 2844200" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>I agree the 6.8 might be better in terms of kinetic energy, but at shorter range, the accuracy improvement is negated, but with my .300, it's SBR'd. Give up some in kinetics, but it's still plenty of energy to take a hog with decently-placed shot, while being lighter and easier to wield, I think. Hopefully one of these days I'll have some opportunities to try both and compare. <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 2844200, member: 9374"] I agree the 6.8 might be better in terms of kinetic energy, but at shorter range, the accuracy improvement is negated, but with my .300, it's SBR'd. Give up some in kinetics, but it's still plenty of energy to take a hog with decently-placed shot, while being lighter and easier to wield, I think. Hopefully one of these days I'll have some opportunities to try both and compare. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Wild Porker
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom