Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Wind and Solar Ain't Cheap nor Environmentally Friendly
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3422452" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>All of our coal came from Wyoming. Low sulphur stuff that was easy to meet EPA requirements. </p><p>When Sooner PP was first built, the legislature required the plant to use 10% Oklahoma coal to give a boost to that industry. </p><p>It was so high in sulphur that it could never meet EPA requirements, no matter how it was treated. That requirement was abandoned. </p><p>Oklahoma has a lot of coal underground. It's not usable though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3422452, member: 5412"] All of our coal came from Wyoming. Low sulphur stuff that was easy to meet EPA requirements. When Sooner PP was first built, the legislature required the plant to use 10% Oklahoma coal to give a boost to that industry. It was so high in sulphur that it could never meet EPA requirements, no matter how it was treated. That requirement was abandoned. Oklahoma has a lot of coal underground. It's not usable though. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Wind and Solar Ain't Cheap nor Environmentally Friendly
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom