Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Wisconsin protest, a sign of things to come?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Brown" data-source="post: 1464414" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>The issue isn't one of fairness; The employers' action is a breach of the contract that THEY wrote. The issue is that unless the infraction by an employer is so financially devastating to an employee that it becomes worth losing their job over, NO ONE oversees an employer's actions unless there is a union in place. </p><p></p><p>An employer can fire an employee for the slightest of infractions, as it should be. </p><p></p><p>However an employee has NO recourse unless an employer's infraction is extraordinary. This is NOT an acceptable practice.</p><p></p><p>YOU as the employer make the choice.</p><p></p><p>That is the difference. If she is ungrateful and overpaid, you likely can find another employee if you so choose. Employees don't typically have this type of flexibility.</p><p></p><p>I don't disagree it goes both ways.</p><p></p><p>What I disagree with is erring on the side of those who wield the power instead of the powerless.</p><p></p><p>Michael Brown</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Brown, post: 1464414, member: 18"] The issue isn't one of fairness; The employers' action is a breach of the contract that THEY wrote. The issue is that unless the infraction by an employer is so financially devastating to an employee that it becomes worth losing their job over, NO ONE oversees an employer's actions unless there is a union in place. An employer can fire an employee for the slightest of infractions, as it should be. However an employee has NO recourse unless an employer's infraction is extraordinary. This is NOT an acceptable practice. YOU as the employer make the choice. That is the difference. If she is ungrateful and overpaid, you likely can find another employee if you so choose. Employees don't typically have this type of flexibility. I don't disagree it goes both ways. What I disagree with is erring on the side of those who wield the power instead of the powerless. Michael Brown [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Wisconsin protest, a sign of things to come?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom