Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Wisconsin protest, a sign of things to come?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1shot(bob)" data-source="post: 1469198" data-attributes="member: 1657"><p>OK, so we agree on that part.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And a lot of the time it doesn't, it gets your contract settled and you back to work.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How about this one: <strong>Practices that eliminate competition, such as collusive bidding, may result in criminal, civil, and/or administrative action against the participants.</strong></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/auctions/treasury/rp/generalterms.shtml" target="_blank">www.ustreas.gov/auctions/treasury/rp/generalterms.shtml</a></strong></p><p>When you make agreements that everyone must follow the same rules or not play the game, often at the threat of physical harm, you are 'colluding' according to this definition. Unions attempt to remove any competitive bidding on getting a job done.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You saw a red herring? Where? You may disagree with my analogy, or actually my question, about the difference between 'collusion' and what unions do, but you can not call it a red herring. It is very relevant to this discussion. Would you care to answer the question?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's the second thing you have said that I agree with. Thank you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1shot(bob), post: 1469198, member: 1657"] OK, so we agree on that part. And a lot of the time it doesn't, it gets your contract settled and you back to work. How about this one: [B]Practices that eliminate competition, such as collusive bidding, may result in criminal, civil, and/or administrative action against the participants. [url]www.ustreas.gov/auctions/treasury/rp/generalterms.shtml[/url][/B] When you make agreements that everyone must follow the same rules or not play the game, often at the threat of physical harm, you are 'colluding' according to this definition. Unions attempt to remove any competitive bidding on getting a job done. You saw a red herring? Where? You may disagree with my analogy, or actually my question, about the difference between 'collusion' and what unions do, but you can not call it a red herring. It is very relevant to this discussion. Would you care to answer the question? That's the second thing you have said that I agree with. Thank you. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Wisconsin protest, a sign of things to come?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom