Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Wolf Debate: Why the State's Rights, Pro-Management Side is Right
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 1347753" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>I do know that the wolf is game in Alaska, and controlled that way.</p><p>The tree huggers in the states that allowed the wolf to come back and decimate the elk, and mule deer herds are nothing but a back door anti-hunting, anti-gun ploy by the libs and tree huggers(one in the same).</p><p>I don't have a problem with predators, but protecting them to the point that hunting seasons are canceled, state revenue's are affected, and people that provide resorts, guides, travel, etc are losing their lively hoods, is not right.</p><p></p><p>Wolves have a place in nature, and when they eradicate all of their food sources, they will go into a decline cycle where there will be sickness, disease and death among the predators. The very animal the tree huggers want to protect.</p><p>They will die to the point the elk, and other animals will rebound, and then the wolf population will rebound, and a see-saw effect will occur.</p><p>Proper managment of the wolf and animal herds will negate this effect.</p><p>This involves human intervention by hunters.</p><p>We live in different times when mother nature took care of everything. </p><p>With the encroachment of people the animals normal habitat has had to evolve. Early on, the Elk were semi plains game living all over the midwest, but have evolved to a mountain animal now to escape us.</p><p>Some how this "protection of the sacred wolves" needs to get to a managment issue, but for now the liberal judges that need to be voted out of office have the upper hand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 1347753, member: 5412"] I do know that the wolf is game in Alaska, and controlled that way. The tree huggers in the states that allowed the wolf to come back and decimate the elk, and mule deer herds are nothing but a back door anti-hunting, anti-gun ploy by the libs and tree huggers(one in the same). I don't have a problem with predators, but protecting them to the point that hunting seasons are canceled, state revenue's are affected, and people that provide resorts, guides, travel, etc are losing their lively hoods, is not right. Wolves have a place in nature, and when they eradicate all of their food sources, they will go into a decline cycle where there will be sickness, disease and death among the predators. The very animal the tree huggers want to protect. They will die to the point the elk, and other animals will rebound, and then the wolf population will rebound, and a see-saw effect will occur. Proper managment of the wolf and animal herds will negate this effect. This involves human intervention by hunters. We live in different times when mother nature took care of everything. With the encroachment of people the animals normal habitat has had to evolve. Early on, the Elk were semi plains game living all over the midwest, but have evolved to a mountain animal now to escape us. Some how this "protection of the sacred wolves" needs to get to a managment issue, but for now the liberal judges that need to be voted out of office have the upper hand. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Wolf Debate: Why the State's Rights, Pro-Management Side is Right
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom