Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Wolf Debate: Why the State's Rights, Pro-Management Side is Right
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="T-Money" data-source="post: 1348609" data-attributes="member: 13621"><p>I would say that the liberal mind is not buffddled with facts and logic at all, but rather emotional, irrational, and illogical opinions and points of view. If they did use facts, logic, and rational they wouldn't be liberal.</p><p></p><p>I belive it is a states right issue. They have already shown the wolf numbers in the US to be more than adequate to be removed from the protected list. However, the libs will not remove the species from the list. These are the same people who put the polar bear on the list because Al Gore said that we were destroying thier habitat. With not one shred of scientific evidence they put the polar bear on the list simply because of a "what if" scenario. Their numbers were far above those need to get put on list and now there are more polar bears than there have ever been, yet they are still on the list. </p><p></p><p>The same thing is happening in CA with the lead ammo ban. Because a condor might ingest lead and die of lead poisoning we have to ban all lead bullets for hunting. Again, we have legislation based not off of science, but simply a "what if" scenario.</p><p></p><p>All this leading back to the point that liberals do not use facts or logic. They are emotional, irrational, and illogical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="T-Money, post: 1348609, member: 13621"] I would say that the liberal mind is not buffddled with facts and logic at all, but rather emotional, irrational, and illogical opinions and points of view. If they did use facts, logic, and rational they wouldn't be liberal. I belive it is a states right issue. They have already shown the wolf numbers in the US to be more than adequate to be removed from the protected list. However, the libs will not remove the species from the list. These are the same people who put the polar bear on the list because Al Gore said that we were destroying thier habitat. With not one shred of scientific evidence they put the polar bear on the list simply because of a "what if" scenario. Their numbers were far above those need to get put on list and now there are more polar bears than there have ever been, yet they are still on the list. The same thing is happening in CA with the lead ammo ban. Because a condor might ingest lead and die of lead poisoning we have to ban all lead bullets for hunting. Again, we have legislation based not off of science, but simply a "what if" scenario. All this leading back to the point that liberals do not use facts or logic. They are emotional, irrational, and illogical. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Wolf Debate: Why the State's Rights, Pro-Management Side is Right
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom