Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
World's largest army, never thought of this.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soonerwings" data-source="post: 1586303" data-attributes="member: 8035"><p>How'd that work out for us against charlie? How'd it work out for us against insurgents in Iraq? How'd it work out for us in the Afghan theater?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You think it would be millions strong by the time the U.S. military was overcome? Hardly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You think off the shelf rifles aren't a match for what the leftover chinese forces would have? Again...most of their toys are going to be broken at this point and again...no one has enough airpower to fight insurgencies taking place all over an area as big as the CONUS. Bin Laden's resistance wasn't nearly as well armed and well provisioned as one here would be.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nor were their "superior" attackers trying to occupy a U.S. sized country.</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>If you're assuming that the Chinese would still have the ability to do this after the U.S. military was defeated then I am valid in assuming that the Canadians and Mexicans could probably lend a hand.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My point is that you are completely dismissing the notion that anything but traditional warfare can bring success and ignoring many historical examples where assymetrical warfare has prevailed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How is it going to happen. Please share.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soonerwings, post: 1586303, member: 8035"] How'd that work out for us against charlie? How'd it work out for us against insurgents in Iraq? How'd it work out for us in the Afghan theater? You think it would be millions strong by the time the U.S. military was overcome? Hardly. You think off the shelf rifles aren't a match for what the leftover chinese forces would have? Again...most of their toys are going to be broken at this point and again...no one has enough airpower to fight insurgencies taking place all over an area as big as the CONUS. Bin Laden's resistance wasn't nearly as well armed and well provisioned as one here would be. Nor were their "superior" attackers trying to occupy a U.S. sized country. . If you're assuming that the Chinese would still have the ability to do this after the U.S. military was defeated then I am valid in assuming that the Canadians and Mexicans could probably lend a hand. My point is that you are completely dismissing the notion that anything but traditional warfare can bring success and ignoring many historical examples where assymetrical warfare has prevailed. How is it going to happen. Please share. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
World's largest army, never thought of this.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom