Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
World's largest army, never thought of this.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soonerwings" data-source="post: 1586364" data-attributes="member: 8035"><p>After this supposed conflict my argument is that their control of air and sea would be insufficient to support an invasion of a country our size.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Looks like you need to re-read my posts as well. I have never argued for a hunter army but quite the opposite. An army is a centralized entity that utilizes symmetrical warfare. What I've argued is that the hunters would be able to beat back an organized invasion force by using assymetrical warfare for a long enough time for the hostile nation to lose its economic ability to keep sustaining an invasion or for said nation to lose its will to fight.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They don't want to play the economic card any more than we do. They can call our debt but we can stop buying their stuff. No one wins in this scenario and both nations realize it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soonerwings, post: 1586364, member: 8035"] After this supposed conflict my argument is that their control of air and sea would be insufficient to support an invasion of a country our size. Looks like you need to re-read my posts as well. I have never argued for a hunter army but quite the opposite. An army is a centralized entity that utilizes symmetrical warfare. What I've argued is that the hunters would be able to beat back an organized invasion force by using assymetrical warfare for a long enough time for the hostile nation to lose its economic ability to keep sustaining an invasion or for said nation to lose its will to fight. Agreed. They don't want to play the economic card any more than we do. They can call our debt but we can stop buying their stuff. No one wins in this scenario and both nations realize it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
World's largest army, never thought of this.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom