Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Would you support a Universal Background Check that does NOT record serial numbers?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fredkrueger100" data-source="post: 2085215" data-attributes="member: 24577"><p>Your exactly right. Why should we let the government take rights away? People have fought for the past 230+ years to preserve our constitution and we are just supposed to sit back and hope nothing happens. Or sit back and hope they only get a background check. I don't think so. We HAVE to be active every day in this. We should not have to give on anything. The current system we have is not broken but only not ran properly. Why not actually prosecute people that break the law? But the way things are now is to let criminals get off easy. Or to not do anything at all. I don't care what the government thinks is right, they are wrong. Nothing that they are proposing will help to make things better, and they know it. It all boils down to one thing, confiscation. Now I know there are some of you who think us that believe this are paranoid. If that is what you think than that is your right, but there are millions out there that feel the same way. I don't remember in 94 sheriffs coming out saying they won't abide by the governments new restrictions if they are passed. Nor were there governors coming out saying the same thing. This is the worst it has ever gotten and the government is hoping that people will side with them because of what happened in sandy hook. They will exploit anything to get what they want. And that is plain sick. Why should we settle for what they want? We DO NOT have to submit. And we SHOULD NOT submit. That is what the government is counting on. Feinstein is already hoping by showing pictures of the dead children that she can convince people to side with her. And Obama does pretty much the same thing. They will stop at nothing to succeed. And if for some reason they do get something passed, we must resist and not let it rule over us. They would be the ones pissing on the constitution, not us. But I do have fears that calling and writing our senators and congressmen won't be enough. We have to sit back and hope they do the right thing. And Coburn is already wanting to do the UBC, so you never know. And this is what scares me the most about it. They are all in it for themselves. When you can't even get a congressman to say the real reason for the 2A is to protect against tyranny you know something is off. He believes that it was created to give people the right to hunt and sport. Well that isn't why it was written. And anyone that doesn't believe the 2A was written to protect against tyranny doesn't really support the 2A in my books. If you did then you wouldn't have any problem saying that. We have to really pour it on more than ever. I just read that a few days ago anti gun groups were in Harrisburg, PA protesting. They are starting to spread everywhere trying to get people to screw us. The more people that join the anti's the harder it will be for us to succeed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fredkrueger100, post: 2085215, member: 24577"] Your exactly right. Why should we let the government take rights away? People have fought for the past 230+ years to preserve our constitution and we are just supposed to sit back and hope nothing happens. Or sit back and hope they only get a background check. I don't think so. We HAVE to be active every day in this. We should not have to give on anything. The current system we have is not broken but only not ran properly. Why not actually prosecute people that break the law? But the way things are now is to let criminals get off easy. Or to not do anything at all. I don't care what the government thinks is right, they are wrong. Nothing that they are proposing will help to make things better, and they know it. It all boils down to one thing, confiscation. Now I know there are some of you who think us that believe this are paranoid. If that is what you think than that is your right, but there are millions out there that feel the same way. I don't remember in 94 sheriffs coming out saying they won't abide by the governments new restrictions if they are passed. Nor were there governors coming out saying the same thing. This is the worst it has ever gotten and the government is hoping that people will side with them because of what happened in sandy hook. They will exploit anything to get what they want. And that is plain sick. Why should we settle for what they want? We DO NOT have to submit. And we SHOULD NOT submit. That is what the government is counting on. Feinstein is already hoping by showing pictures of the dead children that she can convince people to side with her. And Obama does pretty much the same thing. They will stop at nothing to succeed. And if for some reason they do get something passed, we must resist and not let it rule over us. They would be the ones pissing on the constitution, not us. But I do have fears that calling and writing our senators and congressmen won't be enough. We have to sit back and hope they do the right thing. And Coburn is already wanting to do the UBC, so you never know. And this is what scares me the most about it. They are all in it for themselves. When you can't even get a congressman to say the real reason for the 2A is to protect against tyranny you know something is off. He believes that it was created to give people the right to hunt and sport. Well that isn't why it was written. And anyone that doesn't believe the 2A was written to protect against tyranny doesn't really support the 2A in my books. If you did then you wouldn't have any problem saying that. We have to really pour it on more than ever. I just read that a few days ago anti gun groups were in Harrisburg, PA protesting. They are starting to spread everywhere trying to get people to screw us. The more people that join the anti's the harder it will be for us to succeed. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Would you support a Universal Background Check that does NOT record serial numbers?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom