Since I've seen and fired a semi auto AK47, and since those are actually legal to own, then no.. I don't think it's redundant to call it a full auto AK-47 when we are referring to one that has a fun switch.
Since I've seen and fired a semi auto AK47, and since those are actually legal to own, then no.. I don't think it's redundant to call it a full auto AK-47 when we are referring to one that has a fun switch.
Couldn't they just have got their tax stamp and it be legal, or is there something I'm missing? Sorry, I'm not Class III savvy.
No, the only full-auto weapons available for civilian ownership are those that were registered with the ATF BEFORE May, 1986. You cannot add a new weapon to that original list (even if it was MADE before '86), only transfer ownership of the ones that already are. (hence the reason why legal civilian full-autos are so expensive, the supply is fixed, the demand is not.)
Haven't seen mug shots anywere yet. Think I may worked with that Troy kid years ago. "Idjit" back then too.
Thanks for the clarification.
Nope. In this case especially. One of the wonder twins reportedly smuggled the gun home from Afghanistan.
Wonder how many times this exact scenario has occurred...
You probably fired an Kalashnikov-pattern semi-automatic, not an AK47.
Well, since we were being technical was the full auto gun in question an AK-47 or an AKM?
Yeah, probably so. But people still call them AK-47s, so clarifying it was full auto was relevant to the story. If it had been semi auto, there would be no story, right?
