So it's OK for George to get out of his car when he stated to the 911 operator that he thinks this person is committing or going to commit a crime (because that somehow makes sense) but it's not ok for Trayvon to attack someone who was following him around at night?
What if their rolls had been reversed and we were hearing testimony from a young Trayvon who had shot Zimmerman after getting out of his car and pursuing Zimmerman which then turned into Zimmerman attacking Trayvon?
What if George Zimmerman had shot Trayvon because George was walking at night and Trayvon began following him?
Seems like there's a lot of mental gymnastics going on here for folks to justify their positions - ironically enough, many of these positions seem to contradict some positions taken in the OKC Pharmacy case with some of the same folks who commented about both cases.
Sounds like there's some other factor aside from the individual actions of the people involved.
What if their rolls had been reversed and we were hearing testimony from a young Trayvon who had shot Zimmerman after getting out of his car and pursuing Zimmerman which then turned into Zimmerman attacking Trayvon?
What if George Zimmerman had shot Trayvon because George was walking at night and Trayvon began following him?
Seems like there's a lot of mental gymnastics going on here for folks to justify their positions - ironically enough, many of these positions seem to contradict some positions taken in the OKC Pharmacy case with some of the same folks who commented about both cases.
Sounds like there's some other factor aside from the individual actions of the people involved.