if I was on the jury, I’d be laughing so hard that the judge would be forced to declare a recess….."Gentleman and Gentlewomen of the Jury, the prosecution contends that Mr Tanstaafl showed intention and forethought of malice and homicide to shoot anyone lethally. A Glock 19 was not lethal enough for him, he carefully chose and modified his Glock 19 so it was a laser precise killing machine, capable of firing faster, acquiring a target quicker, reloaded quicker and had an ultralight trigger so that he could murder the deceased in cold blood with as many shots as he wanted almost unconsciously. He fancied himself to be a gunfighter of the new west, a self crafted killing machine. The prosecution rests its case."
Yes, a ridiculous example, however why risk any of that when either firearm can get the job done?