Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How to cancel your NRA membership
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1313928" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>This issue is that with McDonald we have LOST the chance at P and I and are now stuck with Due Process. If McDonald had been incorporated through P and I, then the only thing left for litigation would have been prohibitions that are currently in place. Through Due Process, not only are current infringements subject to litigation, but any infringements that any federal, state, or local government body decides to implement later are also subject to determination by the Supreme Court as to whether it is "reasonable", "rational", "longstanding", or "essential" to furthering the goals of the government.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not just that they split on the Second Amendment, it is that we only have one Justice (Clarence Thomas) who sees that government has overstepped the bounds laid out in the Constitution and believes that the rulings which have allowed it to do so should be revisited. The other eight believe that taking any power away from government that the Court has previously granted is wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1313928, member: 5151"] This issue is that with McDonald we have LOST the chance at P and I and are now stuck with Due Process. If McDonald had been incorporated through P and I, then the only thing left for litigation would have been prohibitions that are currently in place. Through Due Process, not only are current infringements subject to litigation, but any infringements that any federal, state, or local government body decides to implement later are also subject to determination by the Supreme Court as to whether it is "reasonable", "rational", "longstanding", or "essential" to furthering the goals of the government. It is not just that they split on the Second Amendment, it is that we only have one Justice (Clarence Thomas) who sees that government has overstepped the bounds laid out in the Constitution and believes that the rulings which have allowed it to do so should be revisited. The other eight believe that taking any power away from government that the Court has previously granted is wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How to cancel your NRA membership
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom