Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MadDogs" data-source="post: 2898793" data-attributes="member: 11175"><p>How amusing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>“Long lasting” according to who? You and other progressively challenged liberals who only rely on DNC coloring books like “Think Progress” and the serial losers at <em>Occupy Democrats</em> for your shrill talking points?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How would you know what a scientist does beyond “Dexter’s Laboratory”? Wouldn't a scientist utilize sound methodology and statements from fact-based research to back up what they say?</p><p></p><p>Reason why I say that is that you have a track record of making comments right out of liberal coloring books and then not backing what you say up which is not very scientific. Example … when you were challenged (by two people) on another thread to backup your comment that “<em>The republican platform still (i.e., today; currently) has policies that are prejudicial and discriminatory in regard to brown and black people</em> …” you whined and ran away from your statement. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not that you have any credibility, but that was ripe. Did you get your shrill talking point of the Republicans having a racist platform from Think Progress? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>“Ya’ll”? Are you trying to share an idiomatic bond with those reading your posts? How flip’n cute. Should I add a "hon" at the end of my comments to you to do the same?</p><p></p><p>Back on point, you sourced a liberal hit piece that had zero merit (factual identification of “known problems”) <strong>that was intended to discredit the pro-gun rights side</strong>. And you still trying to sell that you are not a fan of Obama or Think Progress?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MadDogs, post: 2898793, member: 11175"] How amusing. “Long lasting” according to who? You and other progressively challenged liberals who only rely on DNC coloring books like “Think Progress” and the serial losers at [I]Occupy Democrats[/I] for your shrill talking points? How would you know what a scientist does beyond “Dexter’s Laboratory”? Wouldn't a scientist utilize sound methodology and statements from fact-based research to back up what they say? Reason why I say that is that you have a track record of making comments right out of liberal coloring books and then not backing what you say up which is not very scientific. Example … when you were challenged (by two people) on another thread to backup your comment that “[I]The republican platform still (i.e., today; currently) has policies that are prejudicial and discriminatory in regard to brown and black people[/I] …” you whined and ran away from your statement. Not that you have any credibility, but that was ripe. Did you get your shrill talking point of the Republicans having a racist platform from Think Progress? “Ya’ll”? Are you trying to share an idiomatic bond with those reading your posts? How flip’n cute. Should I add a "hon" at the end of my comments to you to do the same? Back on point, you sourced a liberal hit piece that had zero merit (factual identification of “known problems”) [B]that was intended to discredit the pro-gun rights side[/B]. And you still trying to sell that you are not a fan of Obama or Think Progress? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom