Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YukonGlocker" data-source="post: 2898796" data-attributes="member: 425"><p>Fair enough. This is important enough to me that I need to write a piece on it myself. The are major flaws in some of Lott's methods and analyses, and also major flaws in some of the critiques of his work. This is an important discussion because the anti-gun people aren't taking anything beyond face value (and neither are the pro-gun people)...but the problem has become using Lott's findings as evidence (in either direction), and that needs to be fully fleshed out and gone through public review. Just as people here are refusing to consider anything posted in thinkprogress, other people are refusing to consider anything coming from Lott, just because of the source (i.e., the genetic fallacy). Thanks for the motivation to do more...I now have another project for the coming semester!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YukonGlocker, post: 2898796, member: 425"] Fair enough. This is important enough to me that I need to write a piece on it myself. The are major flaws in some of Lott's methods and analyses, and also major flaws in some of the critiques of his work. This is an important discussion because the anti-gun people aren't taking anything beyond face value (and neither are the pro-gun people)...but the problem has become using Lott's findings as evidence (in either direction), and that needs to be fully fleshed out and gone through public review. Just as people here are refusing to consider anything posted in thinkprogress, other people are refusing to consider anything coming from Lott, just because of the source (i.e., the genetic fallacy). Thanks for the motivation to do more...I now have another project for the coming semester! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom