Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2898821" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>I'm kinda in the same boat. But here's my take. You mentioned "consensus". This is a dangerous word because while there those of us who are not so quick to take the word of others as gospel, the masses tend to do just that. There is no consensus in science. Sorry there just isn't. It's strictly a true/false proposition. Science is not up for a vote. If a bunch of scientists get together and say that they "think probably something is xxxxxx" that just means that they don't freaking know. Politicians tend to take that as a yes, it's indisputable scientific fact because there is a "consensus". Then they go off and act on it. That's precisely why we can't even buy freon now and how they came up with a "carbon footprint" and the dire need to regulate it. They will use the same regurgitated ******** methodology/philosophy out of academia get our guns if we let them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2898821, member: 3099"] I'm kinda in the same boat. But here's my take. You mentioned "consensus". This is a dangerous word because while there those of us who are not so quick to take the word of others as gospel, the masses tend to do just that. There is no consensus in science. Sorry there just isn't. It's strictly a true/false proposition. Science is not up for a vote. If a bunch of scientists get together and say that they "think probably something is xxxxxx" that just means that they don't freaking know. Politicians tend to take that as a yes, it's indisputable scientific fact because there is a "consensus". Then they go off and act on it. That's precisely why we can't even buy freon now and how they came up with a "carbon footprint" and the dire need to regulate it. They will use the same regurgitated ******** methodology/philosophy out of academia get our guns if we let them. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom