Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2899369" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>If they don't have access to the raw data OR the formulas, how do they know its flawed? By what standards did they determine that the data was corrupt? Science critics should be restricted to critiquing the science, not the results. Just because you're a science critic, doesn't mean you're unbiased. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2899369, member: 1132"] If they don't have access to the raw data OR the formulas, how do they know its flawed? By what standards did they determine that the data was corrupt? Science critics should be restricted to critiquing the science, not the results. Just because you're a science critic, doesn't mean you're unbiased. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
John Lott and research about firearms
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom