Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Lance Armstrong gave up.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 1880904" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>Read what other pro cyclists and UCI are saying ... <a href="http://velonews.competitor.com/tag/lance-armstrong-doping" target="_blank">http://velonews.competitor.com/tag/lance-armstrong-doping</a></p><p></p><p>if hundreds of clean drug tests means nothing, then why are all the elite cyclist going through it??? </p><p></p><p>despite all the misleading headlines ... Lance Armstrong has not lost all 7 TDF titles. only UCI can take that away. UCI has issued a statement that until an independent panel looks at the hard evidence. they will not sanction Lance. </p><p></p><p>UCI has stated this case is very unusual that accused cannot see evidence of why he is being charged. so has NO way to defend himself. there is NO way that can be fair to the accused. USADA has not provided any evidence to UCI or to Armstrong. only evidence shared is accusation letter, which is vaguely written at best. </p><p></p><p>let's say for the sake of argument, Lance is guilty of doping despite passing 500+ drugs tests. How can anyone reach back to events that took place back in 1998. statue of limitations has to come into play? </p><p></p><p>two years and millions of $$$ later. if there was one shred of hard evidence, you can bet the US Attorney general would not have dropped case against Lance Armstrong. </p><p></p><p>USADA needs to be stripped of public funding ... enough of this garbage!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 1880904, member: 7629"] Read what other pro cyclists and UCI are saying ... [url]http://velonews.competitor.com/tag/lance-armstrong-doping[/url] if hundreds of clean drug tests means nothing, then why are all the elite cyclist going through it??? despite all the misleading headlines ... Lance Armstrong has not lost all 7 TDF titles. only UCI can take that away. UCI has issued a statement that until an independent panel looks at the hard evidence. they will not sanction Lance. UCI has stated this case is very unusual that accused cannot see evidence of why he is being charged. so has NO way to defend himself. there is NO way that can be fair to the accused. USADA has not provided any evidence to UCI or to Armstrong. only evidence shared is accusation letter, which is vaguely written at best. let's say for the sake of argument, Lance is guilty of doping despite passing 500+ drugs tests. How can anyone reach back to events that took place back in 1998. statue of limitations has to come into play? two years and millions of $$$ later. if there was one shred of hard evidence, you can bet the US Attorney general would not have dropped case against Lance Armstrong. USADA needs to be stripped of public funding ... enough of this garbage!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Lance Armstrong gave up.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom