Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma Law Maker introduces 4 new Gun Bills
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2932490" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Martha Stewart is a felon but is no danger to society yet she is prohibited from keeping and bearing arms. Once released from prison, any felon should be able to keep and bear arms. The state has basically declared such a person to no longer be any danger simply by the act of setting them free.</p><p></p><p>With nearly everyone bearing arms, anyone with bad intentions will face that armed society and if they don't think twice, they stand a bigger chance of dying than succeeding with their evil plot.</p><p></p><p>What is to prevent an adjudicated violent person from causing harm with means other than firearms? Some are irredeemable and should not be set free. As for the lot of dead folks(executed), better them than any civil member of society. Only the adjudicated irredeemable violent felons need be kept in prison, an institution, or executed.</p><p></p><p>As for your druggies, if they are judged to be redeemed, like anyone else who can be considered safe out in society, ought to be released with their inalienable rights. I find it laughable that these felons don't lose any other rights!</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2932490, member: 745"] Martha Stewart is a felon but is no danger to society yet she is prohibited from keeping and bearing arms. Once released from prison, any felon should be able to keep and bear arms. The state has basically declared such a person to no longer be any danger simply by the act of setting them free. With nearly everyone bearing arms, anyone with bad intentions will face that armed society and if they don't think twice, they stand a bigger chance of dying than succeeding with their evil plot. What is to prevent an adjudicated violent person from causing harm with means other than firearms? Some are irredeemable and should not be set free. As for the lot of dead folks(executed), better them than any civil member of society. Only the adjudicated irredeemable violent felons need be kept in prison, an institution, or executed. As for your druggies, if they are judged to be redeemed, like anyone else who can be considered safe out in society, ought to be released with their inalienable rights. I find it laughable that these felons don't lose any other rights! Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma Law Maker introduces 4 new Gun Bills
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom