Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma Law Maker introduces 4 new Gun Bills
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frederick" data-source="post: 2934008" data-attributes="member: 17825"><p>Technically you're right. but if you're in a city and can't take your gun into any building within the city, that's a pretty broad prohibition. So the only way i could see you carrying a loaded gun in Boston is if you only planned to pass through Boston without going into any of the buildings within the city. It would be sort of like the equivilant of the unloaded transportation laws they have now.</p><p></p><p>It's sort of like California banning bullets in any building in the State. Technically not illegal to have bullets, but if you can't bring them into any buildings it a de facto ban.</p><p></p><p>in the 18th century, no powder meant (effectively) no guns.</p><p></p><p>So the average person living within Boston would not have access to powder for their firearms or weapons. For carry or otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frederick, post: 2934008, member: 17825"] Technically you're right. but if you're in a city and can't take your gun into any building within the city, that's a pretty broad prohibition. So the only way i could see you carrying a loaded gun in Boston is if you only planned to pass through Boston without going into any of the buildings within the city. It would be sort of like the equivilant of the unloaded transportation laws they have now. It's sort of like California banning bullets in any building in the State. Technically not illegal to have bullets, but if you can't bring them into any buildings it a de facto ban. in the 18th century, no powder meant (effectively) no guns. So the average person living within Boston would not have access to powder for their firearms or weapons. For carry or otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma Law Maker introduces 4 new Gun Bills
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom