But, but, but, it's a nine....
Right. The amount of R&D they did on the Dagger is ginormous. What a innovative companySpringfeld is at least 0-2 on new releases being smooth. The SA-35 and the Prodigy both had problems.
I'll stick with my PSA Dagger and not have to worry about PSA selling us down the river like Springfield did.
The R&D on the Hi Power was done in the 1930s, yet Springfield still screwed up their version for release and HS Produkt did the R&D for what became the XD, yet when sold as the HS2000 it cost about half of what Springfield sells them for. At least PSA sells their Glock clone (that they make themselves) for half of what Glock does.Right. The amount of R&D they did on the Dagger is ginormous. What a innovative company
You know it needs it!It does have a "second sear" to prevent coffee table shootings.
My comment has nothing to do with Springfield. Only that PSA garbageThe R&D on the Hi Power was done in the 1930s, yet Springfield still screwed up their version for release and HS Produkt did the R&D for what became the XD, yet when sold as the HS2000 it cost about half of what Springfield sells them for. At least PSA sells their Glock clone (that they make themselves) for half of what Glock does.
Enter your email address to join: