Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus G3C 9mm
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HoLeChit" data-source="post: 4166032" data-attributes="member: 35036"><p>I’m no fanboy, but I can’t say that I have seen any? Springfields have issues that pop up here and there with longevity and their initial releases typically need the creases worked out, Sig Sauer beta tests on their customers, I’ve seen a lot of bad about FN, most Taurus pistols are iffy, smith and Wesson’s newer stuff is pretty good, but the 10mm M&P seems to be plagued with issues. I can’t find much on glonks except for G44 issues, operator error, and reliability issues caused by aftermarket parts, clones, and user modifications. </p><p></p><p>I agree that the triggers, ergos, and sights aren’t exactly the best, but ergos are different for everyone on every gun, triggers can be smoothed out, adjusted, replaced, or trained to compensate for, and sights can be modified or replaced easily. I think a big part of the reliability argument is just a problem of overconsumption of information; but it makes it hard for me to move outside of the glonk box now that I’ve found myself in there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HoLeChit, post: 4166032, member: 35036"] I’m no fanboy, but I can’t say that I have seen any? Springfields have issues that pop up here and there with longevity and their initial releases typically need the creases worked out, Sig Sauer beta tests on their customers, I’ve seen a lot of bad about FN, most Taurus pistols are iffy, smith and Wesson’s newer stuff is pretty good, but the 10mm M&P seems to be plagued with issues. I can’t find much on glonks except for G44 issues, operator error, and reliability issues caused by aftermarket parts, clones, and user modifications. I agree that the triggers, ergos, and sights aren’t exactly the best, but ergos are different for everyone on every gun, triggers can be smoothed out, adjusted, replaced, or trained to compensate for, and sights can be modified or replaced easily. I think a big part of the reliability argument is just a problem of overconsumption of information; but it makes it hard for me to move outside of the glonk box now that I’ve found myself in there. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus G3C 9mm
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom