The U.S. Govenment is Conducting a Ponzi Scheme

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TerryMiller

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
18,780
Reaction score
18,572
Location
Here, but occasionally There.

Hawgman

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
1,836
Reaction score
841
Location
Yukon
The government of the United States has been running a Ponzi scheme since FDR. It's called Social Security. So yeah, the Treasury Dept, the President, Congress/Senate aren't going to think twice. To them it's just the way you run things.
 

Ace_on_the_Turn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
3,775
Reaction score
418
Location
OKC
On top of that is an article on Zero Hedge about Obama's addition to the national debt. Up around 70% since his administration began.

"It also means that total US debt has increased by 70% under Obama, from $10.625 trillion on January 21, 2009 to $18.005 trillion most recently."

Interesting. They want to add every penny spent in 2009 to Obama's tally.

Since you like to question sources, and not the facts, this is from the most right-wing think tank there is, the CATO Institute.

...critics sometimes blame Obama for things that are not his fault. Listening to a talk radio program yesterday, the host asserted that Obama tripled the budget deficit in his first year. This assertion is understandable, since the deficit jumped from about $450 billion in 2008 to $1.4 trillion in 2009. ... it appears as if Obama’s policies have led to an explosion of debt...But there is one rather important detail that makes a big difference. The chart is based on the assumption that the current administration should be blamed for the 2009 fiscal year. While this makes sense to a casual observer, it is largely untrue. The 2009 fiscal year began October 1, 2008, nearly four months before Obama took office. The budget for the entire fiscal year was largely set in place while Bush was in the White House.

Anyone that claims that Obama has added 70% to the nation debt is lying. Not fudging the numbers, not bending the truth, they are lying. At the end of the 2009 fiscal year, the last one that the Bush administration wrote the budget, the national debt was $11.9 trillion.

Bush, who started with a nearly balanced budget, more than doubled the debt and left a $1.4 trillion deficit. Reagan, the innovator of deficit spending, raised the debt 300%. If Obama added to the debt at the rate Reagan did, it would be $36 trillion when he leaves office. It will be less than $20 trillion.
 

Defnestor

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 8, 2013
Messages
1,636
Reaction score
1
Location
Tulsa
And if some Republican branded puppet takes over in 2016, you'll be blaming the republican congress for every dime spent in 2017. I'm prophetic that way.
 

Ace_on_the_Turn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
3,775
Reaction score
418
Location
OKC
And if some Republican branded puppet takes over in 2016, you'll be blaming the republican congress for every dime spent in 2017. I'm prophetic that way.

It's just a simple fact that the fiscal year of the U.S. government starts in Oct. And the budget is written in the summer. So by the time a new president takes office, the budget that was written 6 months before his hand was raised, is already 33% spent and the other 66% has, for all intents and purposes, already been spent.
 

emapples

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
4,661
Reaction score
3,939
Location
Arrow Repaired
And if some Republican branded puppet takes over in 2016, you'll be blaming the republican congress for every dime spent in 2017. I'm prophetic that way.

LMAO! That's one hell of a crystal ball you have! I bet your right Ace must really like Obama, I cant think of a worse president in my lifetime.... maybe Carter but that's a toss up. Nixon was impeached for doing some of the same things the Obama administration is doing.
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
32,902
Reaction score
46,003
Location
Tulsa
Some folks borrowed some money...... some folks need to be paid back. So "we" printed some money....
 

TerryMiller

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
18,780
Reaction score
18,572
Location
Here, but occasionally There.
"It also means that total US debt has increased by 70% under Obama, from $10.625 trillion on January 21, 2009 to $18.005 trillion most recently."

Interesting. They want to add every penny spent in 2009 to Obama's tally.

Since you like to question sources, and not the facts, this is from the most right-wing think tank there is, the CATO Institute.

...critics sometimes blame Obama for things that are not his fault. Listening to a talk radio program yesterday, the host asserted that Obama tripled the budget deficit in his first year. This assertion is understandable, since the deficit jumped from about $450 billion in 2008 to $1.4 trillion in 2009. ... it appears as if Obama’s policies have led to an explosion of debt...But there is one rather important detail that makes a big difference. The chart is based on the assumption that the current administration should be blamed for the 2009 fiscal year. While this makes sense to a casual observer, it is largely untrue. The 2009 fiscal year began October 1, 2008, nearly four months before Obama took office. The budget for the entire fiscal year was largely set in place while Bush was in the White House.

Anyone that claims that Obama has added 70% to the nation debt is lying. Not fudging the numbers, not bending the truth, they are lying. At the end of the 2009 fiscal year, the last one that the Bush administration wrote the budget, the national debt was $11.9 trillion.

Bush, who started with a nearly balanced budget, more than doubled the debt and left a $1.4 trillion deficit. Reagan, the innovator of deficit spending, raised the debt 300%. If Obama added to the debt at the rate Reagan did, it would be $36 trillion when he leaves office. It will be less than $20 trillion.

Well Ace, you managed to NOT disappoint me. You bring up Bush's last year, which I might point out that those last two years he had a Democratically controlled Congress. You also brought up Reagan, who was way before and had to also deal with Democratically controlled parts of Congress.

And of course, you totally ignored Obumbo's 5+ years after the 2009 fiscal year. Do you now want to address those years instead of ignoring them?
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom