Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The U.S. Govenment is Conducting a Ponzi Scheme
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="securitysix" data-source="post: 2672949" data-attributes="member: 32714"><p>So I see. I just had not read the entire thread to the point where my post appeared. In fact, I just finished reading the post above where you said: </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, I'm no math expert, but it looks like even if you dumped the entire 2009 deficit spending in Bush's lap, Obama would still be "ahead" in the deficit spending game.</p><p></p><p>I'm no fan of Bush or Obama. Sometime after I voted for Bush the second time because I figured he was the "lesser of two evils" (same "reasoning" I used to vote for him the first time), I figured out that A) voting for the lesser of 2 evils is still voting for evil and 2) that the Republocrats and Demicans are two sides of the same coin and voting for either will change nothing. </p><p></p><p>But my point was that regardless of who was President when the 2009 budget was put into place, Obama was part of the government that was involved in passing it, and unless he voted against every part of it, which we know he didn't, he can't wash his hands entirely of the increase in deficit spending for that fiscal year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="securitysix, post: 2672949, member: 32714"] So I see. I just had not read the entire thread to the point where my post appeared. In fact, I just finished reading the post above where you said: Now, I'm no math expert, but it looks like even if you dumped the entire 2009 deficit spending in Bush's lap, Obama would still be "ahead" in the deficit spending game. I'm no fan of Bush or Obama. Sometime after I voted for Bush the second time because I figured he was the "lesser of two evils" (same "reasoning" I used to vote for him the first time), I figured out that A) voting for the lesser of 2 evils is still voting for evil and 2) that the Republocrats and Demicans are two sides of the same coin and voting for either will change nothing. But my point was that regardless of who was President when the 2009 budget was put into place, Obama was part of the government that was involved in passing it, and unless he voted against every part of it, which we know he didn't, he can't wash his hands entirely of the increase in deficit spending for that fiscal year. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The U.S. Govenment is Conducting a Ponzi Scheme
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom