Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tulsa PD shoots unarmed black man
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2908989" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>You didn't answer the question. You're on record here supporting the decision to publicly charge someone with a felony BEFORE having all the readily available information. Its not like he will never get the autopsy and tox reports. So I ask again, what is the benefit of charging her today rather than next week or the week after? </p><p></p><p>If your check engine light comes on, do you ask the shop to begin replacing parts before they get the diagnostics report? If not, then why would you want a DA to file charges before getting all the reports back from the labs? I think we're talking about something a bit more critical than an engine miss here, so what gives?</p><p></p><p>I'm not disputing the charge, I'm disputing the timing. You're defending the timing so give us more than your emotional opinion that it's better to do it without all the available facts in evidence. I'm truly trying to understand your point, so please explain? <img src="/images/smilies/confused.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-shortname=":confused:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2908989, member: 1132"] You didn't answer the question. You're on record here supporting the decision to publicly charge someone with a felony BEFORE having all the readily available information. Its not like he will never get the autopsy and tox reports. So I ask again, what is the benefit of charging her today rather than next week or the week after? If your check engine light comes on, do you ask the shop to begin replacing parts before they get the diagnostics report? If not, then why would you want a DA to file charges before getting all the reports back from the labs? I think we're talking about something a bit more critical than an engine miss here, so what gives? I'm not disputing the charge, I'm disputing the timing. You're defending the timing so give us more than your emotional opinion that it's better to do it without all the available facts in evidence. I'm truly trying to understand your point, so please explain? :confused: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tulsa PD shoots unarmed black man
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom