Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unemployment Abuse?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DanB" data-source="post: 2411687" data-attributes="member: 237"><p>From the time frame you mentioned. She won't get any unemployment benefits as she has not worked enough with the company to qualify. Second, a simple letter stating she was not terminated and detailing the facts of the events would be enough to get the claim denied. Third, Whoever is doing your candidate screening sucks. </p><p></p><p>As far as not costing the company any more money. Immediately not fighting the claim won't cost the company money. However, the next time the company's experience modifier is updated. Then the company will see the cost. The more claims you have the higher that goes. The lower the number of claims the lower it can go. Granted this is all minor increases or decreases. However, It is a factor that goes into calculating state unemployment rates.</p><p></p><p>It also sounds like your HR department and supervisors have a problem keeping their mouths shut. Outside of HR and the employee's immediate supervisor. No one should know if a former employee files for unemployment unless that employee discloses it with their prior coworkers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DanB, post: 2411687, member: 237"] From the time frame you mentioned. She won't get any unemployment benefits as she has not worked enough with the company to qualify. Second, a simple letter stating she was not terminated and detailing the facts of the events would be enough to get the claim denied. Third, Whoever is doing your candidate screening sucks. As far as not costing the company any more money. Immediately not fighting the claim won't cost the company money. However, the next time the company's experience modifier is updated. Then the company will see the cost. The more claims you have the higher that goes. The lower the number of claims the lower it can go. Granted this is all minor increases or decreases. However, It is a factor that goes into calculating state unemployment rates. It also sounds like your HR department and supervisors have a problem keeping their mouths shut. Outside of HR and the employee's immediate supervisor. No one should know if a former employee files for unemployment unless that employee discloses it with their prior coworkers. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unemployment Abuse?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom