UnitedHealth to exit individual insurance market in California

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

DPI

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
1,696
Reaction score
1
Location
Claremore
So the second large insurer is leaving California because of Obamacare. And the Democrats continue the big lie about how good this is for you. I still remember Obama's promise that individuals will be able to keep their current insurance and doctors, it will only be cheaper.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-unitedhealth-insure-calif-20130702,0,4370321.story

The nation's largest health insurer, UnitedHealth Group Inc., is leaving California's individual health insurance market, the second major company to exit in advance of major changes under the Affordable Care Act.

UnitedHealth said it had notified state regulators that it would leave the state's individual market at year-end and force about 8,000 customers to find new coverage. Last month, Aetna Inc., the nation's third-largest health insurer, made a similar move affecting about 50,000 existing policyholders.

Both companies will keep a major presence in California, focusing instead on large and small employers.

The moves illustrate how different companies are responding to a major overhaul of the health insurance market for millions of consumers. Starting Jan. 1, the federal healthcare law forces insurers to accept all individual applicants regardless of their medical history and provide a comprehensive set of benefits with limits on patients' out-of-pocket spending.

Healthcare experts said some national insurers aren't interested in playing by those new rules in states where their presence in the individual market is relatively small and more profits can be made by tending to the employer market.

"The business model of health insurance is fundamentally changing and some companies are willing and able to adapt," said Sabrina Corlette, a research professor at Georgetown University's Center on Health Insurance Reforms. "Given the limited market share those carriers had, UnitedHealth and Aetna have made the calculation that it required too much of an investment to change their strategy in California."

A spokeswoman for UnitedHealth said "our individual business in California has always been relatively small … [and] over the years, it has become more difficult to administer these plans in a cost-effective way for our members."

The departure of another big-name insurer raised concerns about the effect of reduced competition on California consumers.

"I don't think this is a good result for consumers," said California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones. "It means less choice, less competition and even more consolidation of the individual market with three big carriers."

Anthem Blue Cross, Kaiser Permanente and Blue Shield of California dominate the state's individual health market with a collective 87% market share, according to Citigroup data from 2011. UnitedHealth was a small player among individual policyholders with a 2% share. Aetna was slightly larger with a 5% market share.

Anthem is a unit of WellPoint Inc., the nation's second-largest health insurer.

UnitedHealth and Aetna cannot reenter California's individual market for five years after they leave, according to regulators.

This year, both companies opted against selling individual policies in Covered California, the state-run insurance market opening in January. In May, the state selected 13 other health plans and announced proposed rates that were lower than expected.

Outside California, UnitedHealth said it expects to participate in about a dozen exchanges across the country for individuals or small-business customers.

"We continue to evaluate opportunities and make decisions regarding exchanges on a state-by-state basis," said company spokeswoman Cheryl Randolph.

California has been more aggressive than other states in forcing insurers in the exchange to compete more directly on price by establishing uniform deductibles and benefits across four main product categories. In response, many insurers have squeezed hospitals and physician groups for better rates and formed smaller networks of medical providers to hold down premiums.

In March, UnitedHealth proposed a 9% rate increase for about 2,000 California policyholders with student health insurance policies that was scheduled to take effect Aug. 1. That filing with the state insurance department was later withdrawn, records show.
 

Danny Tanner

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
16
Location
Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...the-confusion-and-hide-the-cost-of-obamacare/

I don't know if Members of Congress will be hearing about it in town hall gatherings and other meetings back home over the Fourth of July recess, but the rolling thunder of the approaching ObamaCare train can be heard in the distance. Smart Democrats are beginning to get frantic about the need to suppress the confusion and hide the cost of ObamaCare between now and the 2014 midterm elections. We are just three months away from the October 1st enrollment start date and so far, nothing about the ObamaCare implementation process should be politically encouraging for Democrats. In fact, the more people learn about ObamaCare, the more frightened they become.

Calling this bipartisan-engineered scheme any kind of "care" is a perversion of the English language. It's truly just a huge corporate welfare gift to the insurance industry, courtesy of our Government. Frankly, the people who support this deserve to set socialized medicine good and hard. Only when they've been subjected to this awful bureaucracy while trying to get well, will they finally understand why it's a bad idea. Unfortunately, we're all strapped in for the ride.
 

RickN

Eye Bleach Salesman
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
25,609
Reaction score
34,749
Location
Edmond
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...the-confusion-and-hide-the-cost-of-obamacare/



Calling this bipartisan-engineered scheme any kind of "care" is a perversion of the English language. It's truly just a huge corporate welfare gift to the insurance industry, courtesy of our Government. Frankly, the people who support this deserve to set socialized medicine good and hard. Only when they've been subjected to this awful bureaucracy while trying to get well, will they finally understand why it's a bad idea. Unfortunately, we're all strapped in for the ride.

Calling this train wreck bipartisan shows a complete lack of knowledge about how it came to be.
 

Dave70968

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
6,676
Reaction score
4,619
Location
Norman
Do you have health insurance or are you enough of a rugged individualist to pay for all of your own healthcare?

Voluntarily entering into an insurance contract offends no sense of individualism; it only becomes offensive when one party (usually the insurer) is compelled by force (law) to enter under specified terms.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom