Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Why I "think" I don't need a Glock 43x for EDC
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sh00ter" data-source="post: 3829524" data-attributes="member: 24531"><p>I have been contemplating it since they came out, and almost got one last week but drug my feet and the last one I knew of in the metro area sold the night before I finally went to look at it (again LOL).</p><p></p><p>After watching lots of reviews and reading comments, combined with my own rationale, I think I might have put it to bed finally.</p><p></p><p>First let me say that in order of importance, here are the things that I look at for an EDC gun:</p><p></p><p>1.) comfort to carry</p><p>2.) capacity</p><p>3.) shootability (including effective range & accuracy)</p><p>4.) stopping power</p><p></p><p>I wanted to share some points as to why I don't think I need one (no particular order), and see what others say.</p><p></p><p>- I already own other options that give me carry flexibility (hence why spend more money)</p><p>- I am such a stickler for comfort so I switched to .380 for 90% of carry situations</p><p>- The 43x handle length doesn't work for me in most carry situations (I don't wear a lot of coats and sweatshirts)</p><p>- The 43x capacity is pointless unless I spend the extra money to upgrade to the Shield Arms mags and mag release (vs having other guns that do 10+1 that are smaller)</p><p>- If the 43x has the Shield mags, some people complain it is top heavy when carrying appendix (the barrel isn't nested far enough to offset the heavier handle so there can be movement or comfort issues)</p><p>- The OEM mags are not part of my regular glock "system" (e.g. 17 mag can fit in 26, etc.)</p><p></p><p>If I didn't own any other guns except for the .380, then I would consider buying a 48 for the other 10% carry situations. I also thought about getting a plus base-plate for the regular 43, but then you are extending the handle length which defeats the purpose of what's important to me.</p><p></p><p>I think in my situation, for the 10% where I don't choose .380, I could choose the 19 or the 26 with a spare 19mag on hand. I think a 26 is timeless for EDC gun, and especially if you carry a larger mag as a spare.</p><p></p><p>What says the community on my thoughts and the 43x??? This isn't a debate either, if you have a 43x, I am glad to hear why you choose it and especially if you also own other 9mm glocks. I think the 43x is a fine gun and fine choice for those who find the rght niche for it in their carry lineup.</p><p></p><p>This thread is really just to affirm my rationale and finalize my decision so I stop driving my wife crazy discussing it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sh00ter, post: 3829524, member: 24531"] I have been contemplating it since they came out, and almost got one last week but drug my feet and the last one I knew of in the metro area sold the night before I finally went to look at it (again LOL). After watching lots of reviews and reading comments, combined with my own rationale, I think I might have put it to bed finally. First let me say that in order of importance, here are the things that I look at for an EDC gun: 1.) comfort to carry 2.) capacity 3.) shootability (including effective range & accuracy) 4.) stopping power I wanted to share some points as to why I don't think I need one (no particular order), and see what others say. - I already own other options that give me carry flexibility (hence why spend more money) - I am such a stickler for comfort so I switched to .380 for 90% of carry situations - The 43x handle length doesn't work for me in most carry situations (I don't wear a lot of coats and sweatshirts) - The 43x capacity is pointless unless I spend the extra money to upgrade to the Shield Arms mags and mag release (vs having other guns that do 10+1 that are smaller) - If the 43x has the Shield mags, some people complain it is top heavy when carrying appendix (the barrel isn't nested far enough to offset the heavier handle so there can be movement or comfort issues) - The OEM mags are not part of my regular glock "system" (e.g. 17 mag can fit in 26, etc.) If I didn't own any other guns except for the .380, then I would consider buying a 48 for the other 10% carry situations. I also thought about getting a plus base-plate for the regular 43, but then you are extending the handle length which defeats the purpose of what's important to me. I think in my situation, for the 10% where I don't choose .380, I could choose the 19 or the 26 with a spare 19mag on hand. I think a 26 is timeless for EDC gun, and especially if you carry a larger mag as a spare. What says the community on my thoughts and the 43x??? This isn't a debate either, if you have a 43x, I am glad to hear why you choose it and especially if you also own other 9mm glocks. I think the 43x is a fine gun and fine choice for those who find the rght niche for it in their carry lineup. This thread is really just to affirm my rationale and finalize my decision so I stop driving my wife crazy discussing it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Why I "think" I don't need a Glock 43x for EDC
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom