And how do you feel about them now, 1.75 years later, when you have fun sticks with tri lugs on the end of them?
That's a good point if removing the can much. I'm sure many have several hosts and only a couple cans. DT is awesome for simplicity sake when on a primary host. I have gone back and forth on my new can, but I have a 13.9" and if I ever decided to pin and weld a device to reach the mystical length of 16" a QD mount is an unconstitutional consideration.The biggest difference is : Good Quality QD's are heat treated as are the muzzle devices.
Barrels are NOT! After a lot of on and off's the QD's are good as new, the Direct threads on barrels start to loosen and you can have a bullet strike or launch one downrange.
I started out with direct thread but after barrel threads loosening and suppressor threads wearing especially on aluminum cans I went all out Rearden mounts and Rearden/liberty muzzle devices.
Had to re-thread a couple guns and steel thread insert on an aluminum can.
I don't know about unconstitutional but it is a 200 dollar decisionThat's a good point if removing the can much. I'm sure many have several hosts and only a couple cans. DT is awesome for simplicity sake when on a primary host. I have gone back and forth on my new can, but I have a 13.9" and if I ever decided to pin and weld a device to reach the mystical length of 16" a QD mount is an unconstitutional consideration.
Guess it depends on how one would interpret certain parts of the Constitution. But, it could mean a 10 year and $10,000 decision, as well.I don't know about unconstitutional but it is a 200 dollar decision
Enter your email address to join: