By Michael LeMieux
August 8, 2011
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/LeMieux/michael156.htm
August 8, 2011
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/LeMieux/michael156.htm
A good read, but it's been said over and over again. I know it, you know it. The trouble is, although the country is filled with firearm owners, who among them would actually stick their necks out to do what's right?
I agree, there is no good reason any law abiding citizen should not be able to own a military weapon, like M-16, AK, or even something of newer design, manufactured last year. There is no good reason to impose a $200 tax. There is no good reason to require that law abiding citizens that do own said weapons should be on a registry. The fact is, it hinders our right to bear arms (any arm we should choose) for the very reason of overcoming the tyranny of government gone wild. BUT... unless we stand as a whole people, it will only continue to get more restrictive, just as the Governor of Pennsylvania said way back when, as he gave Parliament his thoughts on the matter of disarming the people. The fact is, it will never happen (standing united on the problem). Sad, but true.
Did you see the author is from Midwest City?
Many gunowners only support rights that affect them. In that respect they are no different than those who would take those right away. The anti's would scream if their rights were touched and many gun owners would do the same. Sadly there are many in both camps who see no problem with taking away the rights of others.A good read, but it's been said over and over again. I know it, you know it. The trouble is, although the country is filled with firearm owners, who among them would actually stick their necks out to do what's right?
Many gunowners only support rights that affect them. In that respect they are no different than those who would take those right away. The anti's would scream if their rights were touched and many gun owners would do the same. Sadly there are many in both camps who see no problem with taking away the rights of others.
Before the machine gun ban of 1986 was enacted I was trying to gather support against it. I was very surprised at the number of avid shooters who had no problem with the ban. Some told me that no one needed a machine. Others said that so long as they don't take my shotgun I don't care what laws they make. We have people in our camp who could not care less about rights unless it directly affects them.
Michael
No one really needs extra bacon on a cheese burger.
Heyyyyyyy!!!! Slow down.
No one needs to get hurt over this.
Michael Brown
Enter your email address to join: