Where is the financial status requirement laid out in The Constitution?
Obviously there is not one. But then again there aren’t constitutional rules about needing signatures to get on the ballot either, yet those rules exist at the state level. Clearly the constitution says what minimums are required so that a person CAN be president.
And as I said, the law seems to apply equally for people seeking to be on the presidential ballot in California. As was noted above, there is no test to see how much money you have to qualify, merely the act of releasing the document.
Nothing in the California law would (seem to) negate trump (or any candidate) from being president. He or she would just have a harder time if the candidates opts out of releasing the document, which would be a choice on that person’s part.
The courts may see it as a burden. I never said otherwise. But you still haven’t shown how it discrinates against trump simply because he doesn’t want to release the filings.