Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
05/15/2022 Another Mass Shooting. This time at a California Church
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3780991" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>There is a constitutional remedy. It is called due process followed up with imprisonment or execution. People in prison may still have the right but their access to arms is deprived as is recognized in the Fifth Amendment. Once released from prison however, their access to life, liberty, and property is no longer deprived of them. The solution? Don't release them from prison until it can be proven in a court of law that they are no longer a threat to society. Therein lies the rub. A set prison term for someone convicted of a violent crime, even if served completely, is no assurance a violent felon is safe to be released from prison. So, not safe to be armed? Keep them in prison. </p><p></p><p>Also note that this need not only concern arms. A violent person can turn anything into a deadly weapon. So, as I said, there should be no release of a person convicted of a violent crime from prison until it can be proven in a court of law that that person is no longer a threat to society. For those who are not executed, we need a few Papillion Islands to stockpile these criminals who cannot pass muster. </p><p></p><p>Harsh? No. It is prudent.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3780991, member: 745"] There is a constitutional remedy. It is called due process followed up with imprisonment or execution. People in prison may still have the right but their access to arms is deprived as is recognized in the Fifth Amendment. Once released from prison however, their access to life, liberty, and property is no longer deprived of them. The solution? Don't release them from prison until it can be proven in a court of law that they are no longer a threat to society. Therein lies the rub. A set prison term for someone convicted of a violent crime, even if served completely, is no assurance a violent felon is safe to be released from prison. So, not safe to be armed? Keep them in prison. Also note that this need not only concern arms. A violent person can turn anything into a deadly weapon. So, as I said, there should be no release of a person convicted of a violent crime from prison until it can be proven in a court of law that that person is no longer a threat to society. For those who are not executed, we need a few Papillion Islands to stockpile these criminals who cannot pass muster. Harsh? No. It is prudent. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
05/15/2022 Another Mass Shooting. This time at a California Church
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom