Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
$1.3 Trillion budget passes the House
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3097266" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>Interesting. </p><p>There is a lot of questions here. It's well known in political/budget circles that if you get an allocation in the budget and don't spend it, you will be docked that amount the next budget.</p><p>If money managers in each political geographical area that got allocations to maintain facilities could say they dont</p><p>need it, and they would not be reprimanded for doing so, getting a bonus for maintenance at the lowest cost that met the requirements for basic needs be rewarded?</p><p>There are pitfalls for this process, but its a way out of the the current process where if money is not spent, you lose the money. </p><p>Financial responsibility is the term I'm looking for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3097266, member: 5412"] Interesting. There is a lot of questions here. It's well known in political/budget circles that if you get an allocation in the budget and don't spend it, you will be docked that amount the next budget. If money managers in each political geographical area that got allocations to maintain facilities could say they dont need it, and they would not be reprimanded for doing so, getting a bonus for maintenance at the lowest cost that met the requirements for basic needs be rewarded? There are pitfalls for this process, but its a way out of the the current process where if money is not spent, you lose the money. Financial responsibility is the term I'm looking for. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
$1.3 Trillion budget passes the House
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom