Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
26 nosler
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swampratt" data-source="post: 3079674" data-attributes="member: 15054"><p>I make my targets all the time.</p><p>If you add lines to make a cross you can keep the cross hairs lined up with those on paper so you aren't canted and may tighten the groups.</p><p></p><p>NOW here is what i do just draw a cross and do NOT try and cover the lines with the cross hairs BUT instead</p><p>Lay the cross hairs just beside the lines so you still barely see them ... cross hairs just touching the lines you drew on paper.</p><p></p><p>Ease into that trigger and see if that makes smaller groups for you.</p><p></p><p>If you cover the drawn lines you can be as much as 1/2" off depending on how thick the reticle is on your scope.</p><p></p><p>My nikon buckmaster 3-9x40 would cover 3/4" square at 100 yards.. my best group was 3/4".</p><p>But I was then covering my lines.</p><p></p><p>I stepped up yes stepped up to a Centerpoint 4-16x40 which covered 1/4" at 100 my groups shrank to under .4"</p><p>Clarity was better on the centerpoint past 200 yards.</p><p></p><p>Sad to say though the one I got is an old model no longer made and the new ones well ones from 2 years ago are not as good.</p><p></p><p>I recently got a new 3-9x40 nikon and a 3-9x40 redfield and my 3-9x40 tasco was easier to see the .223 bullet holes with at 100 yards.</p><p>My exes must like cheap scopes or i just got lucky.</p><p>I was using the Tasco for spotting where the others were shooting.</p><p>Almost looked like the Tasco actually had more magnification. and that may have been it. Yes I adjusted focus to the best spot for my eyes on all scopes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="swampratt, post: 3079674, member: 15054"] I make my targets all the time. If you add lines to make a cross you can keep the cross hairs lined up with those on paper so you aren't canted and may tighten the groups. NOW here is what i do just draw a cross and do NOT try and cover the lines with the cross hairs BUT instead Lay the cross hairs just beside the lines so you still barely see them ... cross hairs just touching the lines you drew on paper. Ease into that trigger and see if that makes smaller groups for you. If you cover the drawn lines you can be as much as 1/2" off depending on how thick the reticle is on your scope. My nikon buckmaster 3-9x40 would cover 3/4" square at 100 yards.. my best group was 3/4". But I was then covering my lines. I stepped up yes stepped up to a Centerpoint 4-16x40 which covered 1/4" at 100 my groups shrank to under .4" Clarity was better on the centerpoint past 200 yards. Sad to say though the one I got is an old model no longer made and the new ones well ones from 2 years ago are not as good. I recently got a new 3-9x40 nikon and a 3-9x40 redfield and my 3-9x40 tasco was easier to see the .223 bullet holes with at 100 yards. My exes must like cheap scopes or i just got lucky. I was using the Tasco for spotting where the others were shooting. Almost looked like the Tasco actually had more magnification. and that may have been it. Yes I adjusted focus to the best spot for my eyes on all scopes. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
26 nosler
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom