Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mad Professor" data-source="post: 3221910" data-attributes="member: 5316"><p>I own a TSO and a PPQ. I have handled a PPQ Q5 match at a Walther display and was not impressed. The standard PPQ sitting right next to it had a better trigger and was like mine. </p><p></p><p>Two entirely different guns. Frame Aluminum vs Polymer. Single action vs striker. </p><p></p><p>The PPQ has one of the best triggers out of the box in a striker polymer frame as anything I’ve owned or fired. M&P both generations, VP9, P320, Glock Gen 3-4-5, XD XDM, etc. My slight complaint with the PPQ is the bore axis seems to be a bit high. I’d like to shoot a steel version, but I think they are over priced. We are talking about a USPSA production (or carry optics) division targeted gun. I think a Shadow 2 is a better choice in that arena and price range. </p><p></p><p>My TSO has a fantastic trigger. Absolutely the lightest stock trigger I have ever handled. Rifle like. 1 lb 6oz. Actually a bit too light and I plan on changing the sear spring to give it an extra ounce or three on the “wall” to better duplicate the feel of some of my other favorite triggers (although lighter). The fit of the stock gun rivals most customs. </p><p></p><p>My main complaint, and it seems to be common, is the blending of the magwell and I didn’t get too excited about the grips. The rear sight is so so, most change to a CZ Custom version. Mine is a .40 however and targeted at USPSA limited. I plan on using it there and shoot bowling pins with it. So .40 was a better choice for me. It is available in 9mm and is only a barrel and mag change away from moving to 9. </p><p></p><p>Another downside of the TSO is the cost of magazines. Be prepared to drop $75-80 each on mags. </p><p></p><p>I may add a frame mounted optic for pin matches, but I’m going to try running it against the open guns like it is for now. </p><p></p><p><img src="https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190404/ad181fdab4e1f06da8ae26799908165d.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mad Professor, post: 3221910, member: 5316"] I own a TSO and a PPQ. I have handled a PPQ Q5 match at a Walther display and was not impressed. The standard PPQ sitting right next to it had a better trigger and was like mine. Two entirely different guns. Frame Aluminum vs Polymer. Single action vs striker. The PPQ has one of the best triggers out of the box in a striker polymer frame as anything I’ve owned or fired. M&P both generations, VP9, P320, Glock Gen 3-4-5, XD XDM, etc. My slight complaint with the PPQ is the bore axis seems to be a bit high. I’d like to shoot a steel version, but I think they are over priced. We are talking about a USPSA production (or carry optics) division targeted gun. I think a Shadow 2 is a better choice in that arena and price range. My TSO has a fantastic trigger. Absolutely the lightest stock trigger I have ever handled. Rifle like. 1 lb 6oz. Actually a bit too light and I plan on changing the sear spring to give it an extra ounce or three on the “wall” to better duplicate the feel of some of my other favorite triggers (although lighter). The fit of the stock gun rivals most customs. My main complaint, and it seems to be common, is the blending of the magwell and I didn’t get too excited about the grips. The rear sight is so so, most change to a CZ Custom version. Mine is a .40 however and targeted at USPSA limited. I plan on using it there and shoot bowling pins with it. So .40 was a better choice for me. It is available in 9mm and is only a barrel and mag change away from moving to 9. Another downside of the TSO is the cost of magazines. Be prepared to drop $75-80 each on mags. I may add a frame mounted optic for pin matches, but I’m going to try running it against the open guns like it is for now. [IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190404/ad181fdab4e1f06da8ae26799908165d.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom