Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
6.8 and the military?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 3116125" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>Urban legends aside, the M-16/M-4 is more than capable in its current configuration. Reports of widespread dissatisfaction with it are exaggerated, as are claims of its inadequacy at moderate ranges, inside 400 yards (every infantryman doesn’t need a long range rifle). </p><p></p><p>The real weakness is training and marksmanship. It’s the Indian, not the arrow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 3116125, member: 42"] Urban legends aside, the M-16/M-4 is more than capable in its current configuration. Reports of widespread dissatisfaction with it are exaggerated, as are claims of its inadequacy at moderate ranges, inside 400 yards (every infantryman doesn’t need a long range rifle). The real weakness is training and marksmanship. It’s the Indian, not the arrow. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
6.8 and the military?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom