Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A Question for Our LEO members...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aries" data-source="post: 3488275" data-attributes="member: 44328"><p>I understand what he's arguing... he's suggesting a "no fault" system. I think that's been done somewhere but I can't remember the details... California? Nevada maybe? I may be remembering something completely different, but it seems like I've heard of it. If it was very successful, you'd think it would be more common.</p><p></p><p>So I get it (I think). I think the difference in our arguments is he's saying you shouldn't expect someone else to take care of you... (but again, you don't have to, as we've both said you can buy all the insurance you want). I'm saying if you cause the damage, you should have to pay to fix the damage.</p><p></p><p>But I don't have all the answers for how to get people to do that. It is a problem. But his proposed solution is already available now, on his part.</p><p></p><p>We just disagree, that's all...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aries, post: 3488275, member: 44328"] I understand what he's arguing... he's suggesting a "no fault" system. I think that's been done somewhere but I can't remember the details... California? Nevada maybe? I may be remembering something completely different, but it seems like I've heard of it. If it was very successful, you'd think it would be more common. So I get it (I think). I think the difference in our arguments is he's saying you shouldn't expect someone else to take care of you... (but again, you don't have to, as we've both said you can buy all the insurance you want). I'm saying if you cause the damage, you should have to pay to fix the damage. But I don't have all the answers for how to get people to do that. It is a problem. But his proposed solution is already available now, on his part. We just disagree, that's all... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A Question for Our LEO members...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom