Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A Question for Our LEO members...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeman" data-source="post: 3488336" data-attributes="member: 10690"><p>There is no state in the United States that does not require "something". Every state requires either liability insurance, a fee paid to the state that is intentionally generally higher than the minimum coverage would be, a cash bond or deposit equal to the minimum generally required, or the ability to demonstrate the financial capability to pay for damage caused by them in the event of an accident. That is going to require most people to buy liability insurance to cover damages caused to others by them. That's a good thing. It just needs to be enforced more stringently. We are a nation of laws. Laws exist to prevent anichary and ensure our rights as citizens against abuses by others, including the government. </p><p></p><p>If there was in fact a "no fault" or more aptly called a "no responsibility" system, there would be nothing to prevent the streets and highways from becoming a demolition derby every time someone got cut off in traffic and had a little road rage. I don't think most people want to live & drive in a Mad Max type world, but then again, maybe some do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeman, post: 3488336, member: 10690"] There is no state in the United States that does not require "something". Every state requires either liability insurance, a fee paid to the state that is intentionally generally higher than the minimum coverage would be, a cash bond or deposit equal to the minimum generally required, or the ability to demonstrate the financial capability to pay for damage caused by them in the event of an accident. That is going to require most people to buy liability insurance to cover damages caused to others by them. That's a good thing. It just needs to be enforced more stringently. We are a nation of laws. Laws exist to prevent anichary and ensure our rights as citizens against abuses by others, including the government. If there was in fact a "no fault" or more aptly called a "no responsibility" system, there would be nothing to prevent the streets and highways from becoming a demolition derby every time someone got cut off in traffic and had a little road rage. I don't think most people want to live & drive in a Mad Max type world, but then again, maybe some do. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A Question for Our LEO members...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom