Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A Question for Our LEO members...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aries" data-source="post: 3488430" data-attributes="member: 44328"><p>Yeah, it's been a while and I don't remember any details, but my impression was no fault meant my insurance covered me and your insurance covered you, regardless of who caused the accident. That was my impression at least, and I don't remember anything being said about requirement (in other words, you may still have been required to carry insurance). But I could be wrong about all of that, it's something I vaguely remember hearing about, and it's possible someone tried it but it was way in the past. Or it's possible I completely misunderstood what they were talking about.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Okay, probably should have done this in the first place but finally googled it, and seems to have more to do with medical claims than with damage claims.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.carinsurance.com/no-fault-states.aspx" target="_blank">https://www.carinsurance.com/no-fault-states.aspx</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aries, post: 3488430, member: 44328"] Yeah, it's been a while and I don't remember any details, but my impression was no fault meant my insurance covered me and your insurance covered you, regardless of who caused the accident. That was my impression at least, and I don't remember anything being said about requirement (in other words, you may still have been required to carry insurance). But I could be wrong about all of that, it's something I vaguely remember hearing about, and it's possible someone tried it but it was way in the past. Or it's possible I completely misunderstood what they were talking about. Edit: Okay, probably should have done this in the first place but finally googled it, and seems to have more to do with medical claims than with damage claims. [URL]https://www.carinsurance.com/no-fault-states.aspx[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A Question for Our LEO members...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom