Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Ahmaud Arbery
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3364211" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>No, you are hung up on a well presented write up by prosecutors who are tainted by former association with the McMichaels. You are also focusing on the fact that Arbery had done something he shouldn't. The fact of the matter is that these two men had no legal right to stop and detain Arbery, and no way in hell had the right to do so with firearms. None. They tried to illegally detain him and he did what anyone would do, he fought for his life. Unfortunately he lost. If this had been a good shot taken, it wouldn't have gone to a grand jury, and a grand jury wouldn't have indicted the two McMichaels. They stepped over the line and cost a man his life.</p><p></p><p>And again, it does not matter what Arbery did before the encounter. If this had been two LEO's, yes, I would argue their case. But the fact that the McMichaels were not any type of LEO, that is what changes it. Now, if they have proof they witnessed Arbery commit a FELONY, which simple trespass is not, then they would have a case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3364211, member: 43724"] No, you are hung up on a well presented write up by prosecutors who are tainted by former association with the McMichaels. You are also focusing on the fact that Arbery had done something he shouldn't. The fact of the matter is that these two men had no legal right to stop and detain Arbery, and no way in hell had the right to do so with firearms. None. They tried to illegally detain him and he did what anyone would do, he fought for his life. Unfortunately he lost. If this had been a good shot taken, it wouldn't have gone to a grand jury, and a grand jury wouldn't have indicted the two McMichaels. They stepped over the line and cost a man his life. And again, it does not matter what Arbery did before the encounter. If this had been two LEO's, yes, I would argue their case. But the fact that the McMichaels were not any type of LEO, that is what changes it. Now, if they have proof they witnessed Arbery commit a FELONY, which simple trespass is not, then they would have a case. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Ahmaud Arbery
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom