Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Anyone want my Pronghorn Doe Tag letter?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow" data-source="post: 1268113" data-attributes="member: 7123"><p>Dude, buzzgun, you're way off base. Way, way off. I'm not bitching about it. I'm explaining FACTS. That other thread is over.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, wrong. It absolutely, 1000% is NOT a controlled hunt. It's no different than a TAG, as issued by Colo, NM, and any number of other states - it ALLOWS you to hunt. If this is a 'controlled hunt', then every tag issued by every state for every species is also a controlled hunt. If that's the way you want to define 'controlled hunt', then fine. But it's not how 99% of the population defines controlled hunt (as one and the same as "tag").</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Exactly, it's a tag, as you point out - thank you. It's a tag, not a controlled hunt. You make my point. Sure, it's organized under the auspices of the "controlled hunt" program, but it's not a controlled hunt. By definition, a controlled hunt gives you a place to hunt at a specific time and specific location. As far as the way I define it, and 99% of the population. Otherwise, why do we have the word "tag" used in many many states where you always have to draw to hunt, yet no specific place is offered?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, you're right. I agree with that, as I did in the other thred. Mea culpa.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do? Really? Show me where I did that? All I want to do is (hopefully) give another hunter an opportunity to hunt, if the W.D. can make an exception to the non-transferability rule.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I know - as I said the other thread (and above) - my fault.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What's that got to do with the price of rice in China? That's extremely weak. You might like those canned hunts, but I'd never do one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's what I said above twice. Maybe you should read the thread before posting. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No it won't. It's not a hunt, remember. As you posted above, it's YOUR responsibility to find the landowner and do everything yourself. They're not gonna check anything until the check station.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How do you know they won't make an exception? Rules change sometimes for reasons, and if they're overrun with them, that just might be the reason. That's why the rules have been evolving on lands with pigs, because they want to get rid of them. Perhaps the rules are evolving here too, on transferability, if they're overrun with the darned speed goats, as I've been hearing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I lost my one in a lifetime opportunity for a tag in OK. I can go to NM, on a friend's land, and hunt them any year I want (albeit for a $300 tag and during very limited days).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, and for that I'm sorry - I didn't forsee the fact that I wouldn't be able to go in October. But it's a doe, not a buck, so I feel better knowing I didn't take away someone's chance to shoot a buck. However, I may try hard to change my schedule around so that I can do it if possible....</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Any other questions or concerns that you have?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, post: 1268113, member: 7123"] Dude, buzzgun, you're way off base. Way, way off. I'm not bitching about it. I'm explaining FACTS. That other thread is over. No, wrong. It absolutely, 1000% is NOT a controlled hunt. It's no different than a TAG, as issued by Colo, NM, and any number of other states - it ALLOWS you to hunt. If this is a 'controlled hunt', then every tag issued by every state for every species is also a controlled hunt. If that's the way you want to define 'controlled hunt', then fine. But it's not how 99% of the population defines controlled hunt (as one and the same as "tag"). Exactly, it's a tag, as you point out - thank you. It's a tag, not a controlled hunt. You make my point. Sure, it's organized under the auspices of the "controlled hunt" program, but it's not a controlled hunt. By definition, a controlled hunt gives you a place to hunt at a specific time and specific location. As far as the way I define it, and 99% of the population. Otherwise, why do we have the word "tag" used in many many states where you always have to draw to hunt, yet no specific place is offered? Yes, you're right. I agree with that, as I did in the other thred. Mea culpa. I do? Really? Show me where I did that? All I want to do is (hopefully) give another hunter an opportunity to hunt, if the W.D. can make an exception to the non-transferability rule. Yeah, I know - as I said the other thread (and above) - my fault. What's that got to do with the price of rice in China? That's extremely weak. You might like those canned hunts, but I'd never do one. That's what I said above twice. Maybe you should read the thread before posting. No it won't. It's not a hunt, remember. As you posted above, it's YOUR responsibility to find the landowner and do everything yourself. They're not gonna check anything until the check station. How do you know they won't make an exception? Rules change sometimes for reasons, and if they're overrun with them, that just might be the reason. That's why the rules have been evolving on lands with pigs, because they want to get rid of them. Perhaps the rules are evolving here too, on transferability, if they're overrun with the darned speed goats, as I've been hearing. Yes, I lost my one in a lifetime opportunity for a tag in OK. I can go to NM, on a friend's land, and hunt them any year I want (albeit for a $300 tag and during very limited days). Yes, and for that I'm sorry - I didn't forsee the fact that I wouldn't be able to go in October. But it's a doe, not a buck, so I feel better knowing I didn't take away someone's chance to shoot a buck. However, I may try hard to change my schedule around so that I can do it if possible.... Any other questions or concerns that you have? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Anyone want my Pronghorn Doe Tag letter?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom