Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Attention LEO's!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Brown" data-source="post: 800779" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>This is being worked on.</p><p></p><p>First, property owners rights as to concealed carry are outlined specifically in title 21.</p><p></p><p>However there is no property owner's right to preempt title 21 if they do business with the public unlike a private residence. The property owners rights refer to the Oklahoma Self Defense Act, not to the lawful carry by a peace officer. </p><p></p><p>There is nothing in state law that allows a private business owner to prohibit lawful carry by a peace officer. The prohibitions on peace officers are outlined in title 21 and private business owners' property rights is not among them. </p><p></p><p>Also HR 218 specifically exempts a qualified active or retired officer from the carry laws of a given jurisdiction so if the property owners' prohibition is based upon a state law, then it will not matter anyway.</p><p></p><p>Thus I think Dan Brown is going to fall flat on his hypocritical face on this.</p><p></p><p>Michael Brown</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Brown, post: 800779, member: 18"] This is being worked on. First, property owners rights as to concealed carry are outlined specifically in title 21. However there is no property owner's right to preempt title 21 if they do business with the public unlike a private residence. The property owners rights refer to the Oklahoma Self Defense Act, not to the lawful carry by a peace officer. There is nothing in state law that allows a private business owner to prohibit lawful carry by a peace officer. The prohibitions on peace officers are outlined in title 21 and private business owners' property rights is not among them. Also HR 218 specifically exempts a qualified active or retired officer from the carry laws of a given jurisdiction so if the property owners' prohibition is based upon a state law, then it will not matter anyway. Thus I think Dan Brown is going to fall flat on his hypocritical face on this. Michael Brown [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Attention LEO's!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom